"It can't be developed one corner
at a time owing to flat nature, the flood plain nature, that it is,"
he said.
NEWS REPORT
Local: Gold Coast canegrowers offer up 6,000ha site for city development
About 40 cane farmers on the northern outskirts of the Gold Coast pitch to sell their farms as a block to a major planner and property developer.
Why should it be developed at all if it
is 'flood plain nature'? Why does such land even get to the stage
where any development other than perhaps a reserve for water birds
might be seriously considered? Does one have to go to Ireland to see
such sensible outcomes, complete with hides and an information
centre? It is simply astonishing that 'flood plain' does not
immediately prohibit any development, especially with the terrible
floods that the city of Brisbane has experienced time and time again
over the years.
One wonders: will this proposal have to
provide boats, lifebuoys and emergency supplies in case of future
flooding? Now this question might sound cynically critical of any
proposal to develop flood plains, extremely ironic, almost silly, but
such conditions have already been placed on one flood plain development
in the Gold Coast city area – see:
http://voussoirs.blogspot.com.au/2015/11/developing-flood-plains.html
Yes, it is true!
Recently a large block of flood plain
has been sold – for development? - at Mudgeeraba in the Gold Coast
hinterland. Some years ago, this land was seen completely flooded,
under about a metre of water, with raging winds creating high waves
across the whole area. Why would anyone develop such a place? Why do
governments keep approving development on flood plains when they know
the problems floods cause? Why would any insurance company have to
provide flood insurance in these locations - known flood plains that
are developed?
The flooded city of Brisbane
When will anyone get some sense? There
is little wonder that the planning profession is considered so
poorly. The world has more planners than ever before, but our towns
and cities are not improving.
If it is recognised that there is a 'flat nature, a flood plain nature' now, one wonders what the impact of climate change might be. Is anyone taking this seriously? Surely the idea of planning is to shape futures using the best information available?
Gold Coast canegrowers offer up 6,000ha
site for city-style development
By Michelle Rafferty and Matt Eaton
Updated Fri at 7:27am
MAP: Norwell 4208
PHOTO: The site is twice the size of Springfield in Ispwich, Mr. Evans said. (Supplied: Canford Property Group)
About 40 cane farmers on the northern
outskirts of the Gold Coast have formed a consortium to sell their
farms as a block to a major planner and property developer.
Several developers have expressed
interest in buying the 6,000-hectare site in the Norwell Valley as
the sugar industry becomes less viable.
The area is sandwiched between the Gold
Coast and Logan and represents one of the last major tracts of
undeveloped land south of Brisbane.
Rocky Point Cane Growers Association
chairman Richard Skopp said they wanted the Queensland Government to
change the agricultural zoning of the area, because economies of
scale meant it was no longer viable to continue cane farming in the
location.
"We'd like to see the South-East
Queensland Regional Plan change to incorporate higher-end use for
this land," he said.
Fellow canegrower and Rocky Point
Future Planning Association president David Huth said the size of the
area necessitated a single zoning plan.
"It can't be developed one corner
at a time owing to flat nature, the flood plain nature, that it is,"
he said.
The project is in the hands of Canford
Property Group, which is seeking a developer with the capacity to
develop a satellite city.
Canford managing director Roland Evans
said all levels of Government knew the significance of the future for
the site, which is twice the size of the Springfield development in
Ipswich.
"We've spoken to [Gold Coast City]
Council, local MPs, met with the State Government and informed the
Federal Government as well," he said.
"We've had support from all levels
of government."
Mr Evans said along with housing, the
plan was expected to incorporate tourism infrastructure, medical
research facilities, an IT facility, an educational area and town
infrastructure.
"Let's create the industries of
the future for our young people so there is no desire for them to go
anywhere else," Mr Evans said.
The State Government is reviewing the
regional plan.
LNP Member for Coomera Michael Crandon
said he attended a Government briefing about the review 10 days ago.
"To be honest, the response I got
was that it is problematic," he said.
"I said we need to stop it being
problematic and backing the farmers and giving the farmers a future."
But Mr Evans said the scale of the
project made government support inevitable.
"Everyone recognises sugarcane
isn't viable now," he said.
State Planning Minister Jackie Trad
said she appreciated the Canford Property Group's vision for the
development.
"However, as acknowledged by
Roland Evans ... finding a buyer is just one part of a long process
given the current zoning of the site," she said.
"The redevelopment of this site
for urban purposes is not currently consistent with the current
planning framework, at both a state and local government level.
"The South East Queensland
Regional Plan is currently being reviewed in partnership with all of
the SEQ councils."
Ms Trad said while the plan was still
being reviewed it was premature to comment on the future of the cane
fields.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.