There are not too
many opportunities to design a new city these days, but when such an
occasion arises, one might hope that the issues that complicate and
frustrate city living in today’s dense settlements might be
attended to rather than having all of the problematical clichés
of these places reproduced in the new plans. Alas, the planned new
city currently referred to oddly as Bradfield City seems to be
an exercise in traditional planning, incorporating every commonplace
notion of this profession’s catalogue rather than any rethinking of
city dwelling. Just as smaller residential developments are blocked
out in the way that all our suburbs are presently subdivided, this
city has accumulated its own blocking system as the idea.
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
The name itself is a
worry. As well as being self-referential in its title, somewhat like
having a car branded as a Toyota Prius Car; or a book titled as The Book of Jokes Book, the naming has all of the qualities of a brand,
something descriptively mundane like Greenacres. There is a
strange self-consciousness assertiveness about this title that seems
as though it might be better used in a Hollywood movie; or does one
say Netflix these days? One can imagine the scripted Yankee drawl
saying, “I’m aff ta Bradfield City ta hun ‘m doownn,” with a
fake determination as the cameras roll on, off into the visual drama
of highway traffic to illustrate the words.
“I’m aff ta Bradfield City ta hun ‘m doownn."
Does this ‘sense
of the movies’ reference come from the design team? The texts –
see: Plans unveiled for Australia’s first new city in over 100
years
https://www.dezeen.com/2026/02/11/plans-unveiled-australias-first-new-city-100-years/
. . . and Bradfield City Master Plan
https://www.nsw.gov.au/about-nsw/precinct-development/delivering-bradfield-city-centre/master-plan
, explains that Bradfield City has been designed by the US firm SOM
and the Australian architects Hassell:
American
studio SOM and Australian studio Hassell have
revealed plans for Bradfield City, a new, 114-hectare city in
western Sydney, which is set to include 10,000
homes, a university campus and a two-hectare park.
Yet again we have
that Aussie cringe where local architects have to team up with an
overseas architectural firm in order to be considered for any project
of any size in this country, as if the local architects might not be
competent enough, or carry the required stature or reputation. Whose
local standing can beat that of any import? – cringe! Given the
events in the world these days, one might wonder why anyone might
team up with a US firm. Could pressure be bought to bear to have the
city named after the person who claims to be the world leader and
constantly seeks naming rights over nearly everything and anything
that might be accessible to such indulgent fantasies? Goodness, what
with the strategies that seem to be like blackmail that are used as
coercion in such cases, anything might be possible here.#
Bradfield City.
Western Sydney International Airport.
Being Planned to
be located beside the recently-completed Western Sydney
International Airport, does not seem to be a good start for any
city. Usually international airports are distanced from cities rather
than having cities designed to be beside such noisy transport nodes.
Given this, one wonders; what are the main strategies for designing
this city? Does one shape it around flight paths? Looking at all of
the published illustrations that have been provided by SOM - The
renders are courtesy of SOM –
(what
has Hassells input been?)
– one sees a collection of what might be AI illustrations of
typical portions
of cites that
we know today, showing
places that could be anywhere, with a bit more stylish
green being
enjoyed by designer
people. The
collection of rendered
buildings seems
to only illustrate
the usual clutter of ad
hoc, random
development that our
ad hoc, random planning has allowed to generate; there
is not one glimpse
of any road or vehicle to
be seen. Yet modern cities use transport roots as their backbone;
their scaffold;
their arteries and veins.
The most isolated,
private place is linked into this transport connectivity that has its
own necessities and dominating
demands. How is this
situation going to be managed in Bradfield City? We
just do not seem to be being told anything but that the city will be
good – liveable
is the usual word these days, with awards being delved out for ‘the
most liveable city’ - Smart technologies included
throughout to enhance liveability.


How
is dwelling going to be managed side by side with the chaos of
traffic as we know it in every city today? We
cannot ignore this shambles; or should not, as it shapes every action
and activity in city lives. Is
this existing city
chaos merely
going to be reproduced and
expanded in this new
centre? The
illustrations all show lovely pedestrian experiences, but where are
the cars? How are they managed? Are they all just out of frame?
Bradfield City.
Canberra.
The
planning illustrates a variety of typical notions that one can see in
designed cities. There are ‘Camillo
Sitte’ type intersections that make little sense for traffic, other
than that of Medieval pedestrians; and there is the stylised
geometric layout
that one sees in Canberra
with main axes and a
concentric octagonal
arrangement of
pieces. What happens
to vehicular flows? Does
one think about the noise;
the intersections;
the pollution when
mapping out these diagrams?
The success of the city will depend
on how the options for both cars and people are intertwined so that
both can operate effectively and efficiently, which, in the case of
the pedestrian, includes the well-being of citizens; their calm
contentment.
Camillo Sitte.
We
need better than this; we need plans with vision, that engage hope
fruitfully and accommodate it with a natural ease; plans that can be
enforced to give places that can truly enrich rather than ones that
we might feel relaxed and comfortable with, as we find ourselves
happily agreeing with the presentation of the familiar. We need
better than AI’s visual slop, for this is what the place looks like
now: self-assured planning images that aim to sell the idea, not
define any real outcome. We need clarity, not muddled ‘perhaps’
and ‘maybes’ that mislead with broad generalities that miss the
very heart of what a city might be – a place for people to live in
and thrive.

Streets are the
framework of the modern city, forming its life-giving thoroughfares
and pathways that connect everything on a hierarchy of use, ranging
from the motorway to the lane. They are the main public places of the
city. Approach any city by vehicle and one experiences that change
from highway to city transition, that fades into the maze of inner
city streets and lanes. One’s full attention is given to the flow
through these zones irrespective of the context, be it a new suburban
area or an ancient cathedral city. The challenge is the same; to find
how to get to the destination; and when one finally achieves this,
the next challenge is where to park, a proposition that might only
restart the challenge of directions. The core experience of place is
the driving, the directions, the seeking of the destination and a
place to park. Yet we see nothing of any vehicle in this plan. Even
arriving in a city by plane or train, one immediately seeks access to
its transport system, be this public transport or private vehicles.
One connects with the arteries that link to the finer connectivity
until one gets to where one desires to be via the veins.


Planning a city
needs to manage the experience of place, not only as a lovely green
and pleasant area, but also as the hustle and bustle of traffic, and
the management of vehicular accommodation. There is some general talk
of the concept of a ten minute city, where everything is only a ten
minute away from a residence, but how might this plan out? What
happens when one walks out from one’s front door? How is one
engaged with place that is a segment of the city? New cities should
grasp the nettle and do more than reproduce our current failures, no
matter how stylish or green these visions might be able to be made.
The question needs to be entertained: how might one best dwell in a
city?


It is sad to read
that First Nations cultural values [will
be] integrated into planting, materials, art, lighting,
signage, and language. No doubt
everyone involved will recite the mantra about recognition of country
etc. – see:
https://voussoirs.blogspot.com/2024/06/country-outside-inside-place.html
– but to have cultural values involved in this simplistic,
trite way, perhaps as
street names and decorative pieces, only seriously devalues the
subtlety and richness in this reference, turning
it into a decorative indulgence, a part of the Public art
featured throughout – box
ticked.
.jpg)


The
list continues with just about every other cliché that can be
envisaged – see below. It is a real concern: Bradfield City will
prioritise design excellence, unique character, rich culture, and
seamless connectivity. The descriptions remind one of a typical
planning assessment for any development, full of motherhood
statements relying on sounding good, impressive, with no real plan
for implementation or enforcement, with the only ambition being the
acceptance/approval of the plan. We need much better than this
shallow blurb and pattern-making that tries so hard to tell everyone that it will embody everything anyone can think of - to be an "inclusive and
climate-resilient" city shaped by indigenous connections to
Country – a term used by First Nations peoples to refer to the
lands, waters and skies.
#
23 FEB 26
It is not a fanciful
concern: see -
Trump Tower
planned for Surfers Paradise will be Australia’s tallest building
and ‘best resort’, local developer claims
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2026/feb/23/trump-tower-surfers-paradise-gold-coast-development-australia?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Other
. . . shaped by indigenous connections to Country.
'The elephant in the room.'
https://www.nsw.gov.au/about-nsw/precinct-development/delivering-bradfield-city-centre/master-plan
Bradfield City
Master Plan
Discover the vision
for Bradfield City with our Master Plan, guiding sustainable growth,
innovation, and vibrant community development.
About the Master Plan
The Master Plan
provides a framework for Bradfield City's growth into a vibrant,
24-hour, 7-day hub of culture, creativity, and innovation within a
parkland setting.
Bradfield City -
Illustrative Master Plan
Key features
Bradfield City will
prioritise design excellence, unique character, rich culture, and
seamless connectivity. The Bradfield
Centre Master Plan outlines these key elements.
Design
We’re embedding
world-class technology, innovative buildings, and vibrant landscapes
to create a city that thrives on design excellence.
Our commitment to
sustainability and designing with Country supports bold goals for net
zero emissions, climate resilience, energy and water efficiency, and
the use of sustainable materials. Green spaces will feature across
the city, including on the ground, walls, and rooftops.
By integrating
cutting-edge technology, we’re building smarter solutions that help
people, businesses, and the environment succeed together.
2 million
square metres of gross floor area available for development.
Space for over
80 buildings exceeding 40 metres (15 storeys and above).
Circular
economy principles supported by the design.
80% green roof
coverage or bio-solar systems to combat urban heat.
Climate-resilient
features designed to maximise energy efficiency and regulate
temperatures.
First Nations
cultural values integrated into planting, materials, art, lighting,
signage, and language.
Smart
technologies included throughout to enhance liveability.
Character
Bradfield City will
offer more than 30% public open space, major event and cultural
areas, and a wide range of retail and dining options. It’s designed
as a place to live, work, gather, play, and stay.
Located next to the
Western Sydney International Airport, the city will also be a hub for
tourism and entertainment, attracting visitors from near and far.
We’re fostering
new industries, jobs, and skills through a world-class research and
education ecosystem, connected to global expertise and opportunities.
36 hectares of
open space, waterways and playgrounds.
2-hectare
Central Park.
2.2 km Green
Loop prioritising First Nations culture throughout the city.
Average 40%
tree canopy cover for a green cool city.
Major event and
dedicated cultural spaces.
Public art
featured throughout.
Movement and
connectivity
A highly accessible
and connected city for everyone.
Green pedestrian
pathways and dedicated cycling lanes will create a people-first
network across the city.
Major bus, road, and
metro interchanges at the city’s centre will link residents,
workers, and visitors to Greater Sydney and the world via the new
Western Sydney International (WSI) Airport.
Pedestrian-friendly
design, with most areas accessible within a 5-minute walk from the
Metro Station.
5-minute metro
connection to the WSI Airport.
Electric
Vehicle (EV) charging stations, designed to support future transport
needs.
17.8 km of bike
trails and lanes for easy and sustainable travel.
https://www.dezeen.com/2026/02/11/plans-unveiled-australias-first-new-city-100-years/
Plans unveiled for Australia's first new city in 100 years
American
studio SOM and Australian studio Hassell have
revealed plans for Bradfield City, a new, 114-hectare city in
western Sydney, which is set to include 10,000 homes, a
university campus and a two-hectare park.
Planned to be
located beside the recently-completed Western Sydney
International Airport, the Bradfield City masterplan proposes an
urban landscape roughly 50 kilometres west of Sydney's central
business district, conceptualised as "Sydney's new urban heart".
The masterplan forms
one of Australia's largest urban development projects and, once
complete, will be the country's first major city built in over a
century, according to SOM.
Key aspects of
the development will include the creation of 10,000 new homes, a
2.2-kilometre Green Loop park, a two-hectare Central Park and four
major civic centres.
SOM
and Hassell designed the proposal in collaboration with
cultural design partners Djinjama and COLA Studio to
be an "inclusive and climate-resilient" city shaped by
indigenous connections to Country – a term used by First Nations
peoples to refer to the lands, waters and skies.
"To design a
new city is both a rare opportunity and a profound responsibility,"
senior associate principal at SOM Michael Powell said.
"Bradfield City
is a chance to shape a vision with Country and community, embedding
resilience, sustainability, and innovation into every layer of the
city."
At the centre of the
development, the First Land Release, also known as Superlot 1, will
encompass a 5.7-hectare site described by SOM as Bradfield City's
"civic heart".
This central area
will be the proposal's first stage and is set to contain 1,400 homes
alongside a university campus, offices, retail space, a hotel and
public space.
Renders of the First
Land Release depict a series of high-rise blocks situated along
tree-lined streets and interspersed with expansive green areas.
Complementing the
city's green areas, a timber pavilion will shelter a gathering space
for the community beneath an interlocking timber structure and woven
canopy.
According to SOM,
this pavilion design draws on the Aboriginal principle of
"enoughness" or taking only what is needed, with the
studios opting for low-carbon and high-performance materials.
Other sustainability
strategies include the use of passive design solutions, green roofs
and solar panels throughout the city's infrastructure to improve
their environmental performance.
"We set out to
create a precinct where nature and urban life are intertwined,
ensuring Bradfield City feels welcoming, sustainable and uniquely of
its place," principal at Hassell Kevin Lloyd said.
The Bradfield City
development is being developed by developer Plenary and has
been backed by more than $1 billion in Australian public investment.
Its first stage of development is planned to roll out over the next
five years.
The renders are
courtesy of SOM.
The void: art imitating life - Country.