The headline suggested that one was going to discover something intriguing about this new project:
Revealed: How architects made this $48m beach complex with only two units - realestate.com.au
https://www.realestate.com.au/news/revealed-how-architects-made-this-48m-beach-complex-with-only-two-units/. The puzzle was that even after reading the article, (see below), one was still left confused about what in particular the headline was referring to. Such are headlines: see - https://voussoirs.blogspot.com/2026/01/robot-house.html.
The project had been seen just recently when passing by, with one assuming that it might be more than two apartments; that was a surprise. The fluted glass down the eastern and western sides had left one wondering why the ‘glasshouse’ concept had been developed for what the text describes as a challenging, tight site - a unique project on a smaller block . . . The block’s size meant the architects needed to engineer creative solutions for maximising available space - and why the glass had been curved, or fluted. The planning possibilities that, using precedent, involve the repetition of this project as a theoretical exercise to assess the potential impacts on this development of the neighbours doing likewise, seemed to be something that no one had considered: see - https://voussoirs.blogspot.com/2025/10/the-new-queensland-house.html. The property to the east was a traditional beach house, and was named as this. This looked like a potential development site. Had this future been contemplated?
There were two statements that stood out in the text:
Each floor is bordered by curved and fluted glass, allowing the owner-occupiers a wide open view of the beach while refracting light to keep their privacy from the outside.
and
“We’re trying to create a modern version of the Queenslander,” he said, “with your veranda and your sunroom at the front.”
Sometimes one wonders why architects try to explain their work. The fluted glass explanation left one curious about the physics, the refracting, because the fluted sides of the project had both been fully curtained off, to, so it appeared, maintain privacy; or might the eastern and western sun have been enhanced by the fluting acting like a lens as in a lighthouse? Might the fluting give the fat lady/skinny lady images of curved mirrors? The neighbouring western development was a tower block of some eight floors, presenting a brick wall with a few openings in it as the prospect. Perhaps the fluted glass might reflect light differently to create something of a baffling, distracting effect during the day, although the curtains could be clearly seen - but at night? One wondered: was the ‘glasshouse’ decision a concept that ignored the context in favour of a preferred styling?
The article continues to detail the architectural intent: to create a modern version of the Queenslander. This raises a complex set of issues, because the Queenslander was a pre-cut house available for the masses, not an multi-million dollar, bespoke development. These homes did have a verandah, but there is more to these structures than this particular element. As for the sunroom: one is left fumbling through one’s memory trying to locate the vision of the traditional sunroom at the front. Sometimes the verandah was enclosed to become a 'sunny' space with the correct orientation, but the traditional plans were modest and functional, providing for the basic necessities of dwelling: living room, dining room, kitchen, bedrooms; and later, a bathroom and WC. Originally the bathroom was below the home or the tank stand, with the WC being a separate ‘ThunderBox’ or ‘dunny’ at the back of the block. One has to be careful with references that pick and choose preferred elements. One wondered what was particularly ‘Queensland’ in this Glasshouse project other than the verandah. The Queenslander was generally careful to protect all openings from the harsh tropical/subtropical sun: see – https://voussoirs.blogspot.com/2025/10/the-new-queensland-house.html.
The title of the project, Glasshouse, brings to mind Philip Johnson’s home in New Canaan, Connecticut, a glass box residence located near a grove of trees surrounded by open lawns: see - https://theglasshouse.org/explore/the-glass-house/ and https://voussoirs.blogspot.com/2017/10/the-need-for-street-view-in-architecture.html. It seems that the ‘glass house’ idea for the Burleigh site has been chosen for the views from this site - a wide open view of the beach. One wonders how distorted views through fluted glass are useful, even when most glimpses through the curved glazing are of the adjacent properties.
Jørn Utzon’s observations come to mind: how, in Japan, he discovered/realised that a view/vista can be more intriguing by being seen partially rather than with full and complete exposure. He cited the experience of seeing blossoms falling across the view of the garden fully framed by the traditional Japanese house with its enclosure of amado shutters, shoji screens, and fusuma panels. Just because there might be a stunning view does not mean a full glass wall is the best response for the greatest impact. One wonders if here, at Burleigh, this glass notion has become a problem. Perhaps it is a fashion? One can look at the new apartment buildings along the Gold Coast and see floor to floor glass on all sides, yes, some curved too, irrespective of orientation and proximity, usually with all sides being curtained off to offer some degree of flexibility with enclosure/disclosure.
Are we just slaves to fashion, left at the mercy of clichés? Street View reveals the ordinary, everyday experience of place that includes the context that is framed out by the architectural eye. The Glasshouse overlooks one of the most popular car park lookouts on the coast. Some time ago there was an application that sought to have this public place closed off, but the reactions to this idea were loud and clear. The site was left overlooking the parked cars and the public enjoying this high promenade. Alas, true to Council’s stubbornness that seems to ignore the public interest, the proposed development plan for Burleigh Heads is still arguing for the car park to be closed! – see: https://gchaveyoursay.com.au/burleigh-hill. Will Council ever listen? - see: https://voussoirs.blogspot.com/2026/02/the-planners-lament.html.
Has the matter of conventional style something to do with expectations of developers who interpret/anticipate the wishes of their potential clients? One is again reminded of a Mies project, the Lake Shore Drive Apartments in Chicago, 1949 - 1951. These two towers were innovative for their time with a novel structural approach, fully prefabricated facade elements, and clever open planning that one can see most clearly in the Farnsworth House, 1949 - 1951. Here, in this classic Modernist home, the core service spaces - the kitchen, the bathroom, the boiler room, storage cupboards, and the fireplace - are all skilfully accommodated in one off-centre block located within the glazed rectangular plan of the house. This juxtaposition defined the other living areas that were arranged around this core, with the kitchen on one narrow side, the bedroom space at one end, the living area located opposite the kitchen, while the dining and second bedroom spaces were at the other entry end that was accessed from the deck. It is a very clever plan, opening up a set of spaces that are traditionally all walled off and connected through doors off a passageway.
Mies used this same strategy for his apartment plans, freeing up small living spaces to create an expansive intrigue of zones available for the occupants' enjoyment, maintaining privacy with shrewd orientations of a few functional elements. The concept did away with the pokey enclosures of the usual clutter of separately defined, exclusive areas linked with just one dim, narrow circulation route.
Alas, the developer claimed that Mies's plans would never be accepted, and the apartments were all altered by others to give the conventional walled rooms and doorways that itemised the experience of the place and limited its views.
Have developers demanded the floor to ceiling glass wall enclosure for local high-rise developments, ironically inspired by Mies's 1922 Skyscraper? Is there some economy for developers with this single-material approach? The full glass experience might be impressive for the visitor, but could one anticipate that it would eventually become an everyday nuisance/annoyance for the occupants?
THE ARTICLE
Architects at bureau^proberts have revealed a close-up look at their recently completed ‘Glasshouse’ project: a Burleigh Heads development with only two homes, which sold for $48 million combined.
Developer Spyre Group’s luxury building broke Gold Coast records at the time of sale, when each of its four-bedroom units sold for $24 million each.
The project’s five levels are divided into three lower floors for the ‘beach house’ residence, and two upper floors and a rooftop retreat for the penthouse.
Only two units exist in the Burleigh Heads home: a three-floor ‘beach house’ and a two-floor penthouse. Each of these homes sold for a whopping $24 million.
Each floor is bordered by curved and fluted glass, allowing the owner-occupiers a wide open view of the beach while refracting light to keep their privacy from the outside.
Bureau^proberts partner and project design lead Dan Liddy said the award-winning development was a unique project on a smaller block, which allowed them to experiment with ideas on a more manageable scale.
“We’re trying to create a modern version of the Queenslander,” he said, “with your veranda and your sunroom at the front.”
The smaller size of the building allowed its architects to attempt an ambitious design, not easily achieved by larger-scaled projects.
The building is surrounded by fluted glass, which offers a full view of the beach while protecting the view inside.
The block’s size meant the architects needed to engineer creative solutions for maximising available space: including pushing some of the land up by 15 metres, with part of the first floor remaining underground.
8 FEB 2026
NOTE
Should one question the report that claims there are only two units in this project? Street View clearly reveals two wheelie bins outside the Glasshouse, numbered 1 and 3. Should one presume that there might be a ‘number 2’ bin?
It is interesting to observe that changes in fire regulations now apparently allow glass boxes to be stacked to give Mies's image of full glass walls and thin slab edges, with minimum fire separation; and for such transparency to be placed side by side on small blocks. Is this progress? The other question is: do people really want to stare at each other?


.png)
.png)
.png)
.jpg)
.jpg)

.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.jpg)
.jpg)

.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)

.jpg)
.png)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)

.png)
.png)

.jpg)

.jpg)




.png)
.png)

.png)

No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.