A relationship with nature seems a strange theme today when architecture is more concerned with its expressive, ‘wild’ and ‘with a jolt,’ bespoke style than anything else: see – https://voussoirs.blogspot.com/2022/04/wild-and-new-with-jolt.html. Being ‘at one with nature’ appears to be more suited to describing the quieter architecture of bygone eras, be this the work of Frank Lloyd Wright, or perhaps that of the traditional Japanese architects: but are things ‘green’ changing our attitude to nature? One could suppose that this might not be so, with ‘green’ things becoming more of a stylish decorative theme than any in-depth referencing of inherent natural, ‘organic’ qualities: see – https://voussoirs.blogspot.com/2022/02/on-vertical-gardens-green-is-good.html. There seems to be very little interest in the work of those who have investigated nature in the past, like that of D’Arcy Thompson (1860 – 1948), a Scottish biologist, mathematician and classics scholar who wrote On Growth and Form in Dundee in 1915, and published it in 1917 – a remarkable study that continues to intrigue.#
The daily reports suggest that something is happening with things ‘natural’: see -
https://www.homedit.com/coastal-australian-home/
https://www.archdaily.com/979786/forest-pavilion-the-forestias-tk-studio
and
https://www.yankodesign.com/2022/04/24/architecture-meets-nature-in-these-biophilic-designs/
The first headline caught the eye and the cynic raised the question - https://www.homedit.com/coastal-australian-home/: This Coastal Australian Home is Completely in Sync With Nature. What on earth can this mean? Was it the word ‘completely’ that raised the doubt; or was it ‘sync’? Perhaps it might just have been the commanding certainty of the exclamatory statement that one questioned?
The text seemed to qualify matters as soon as one started to read it: this magnificent home south of Melbourne, Australia is distinguished by the synergistic visual relationship it has with the natural surroundings. So this is no in-depth, philosophical connection that might be drawing inspiration from latent beauties or their inner rigours in nature, just something visual – well, more than that: its is a synergistic visual relationship, whatever that means. The text tries to explain: it features natural materials and melds with the landscape and is serene and relaxing, both because of its nature-focused orientation and the luxurious ease of the design. . . . The architects used a raw material palette throughout the home, which allows for an emphasis on the surrounding bushland and natural vegetation, and the decor is spare yet luxurious, encouraging a feeling of relaxation and harmony with nature from every room. While the house is angular and glassy, with good views, with an open feeling, the mere words saying that is is Completely in Sync With Nature, leaves one wondering about the hyperbole.
The full text needs to be read to see how the text establishes the visions in its words, for this seems to be what is happening. We need to be careful with texts that can easily encourage us to see things in the manner they suggest rather than with a fresh and unbiased eye c.f. melds with the landscape, and is serene and relaxing, both because of its nature-focused orientation and the luxurious ease . . . Does it? Is it? Might it be so?
The next report that caught the attention was on Foster + Partners and TH Studio’s Forest Pavilion, Forestias in Thailand – https://www.archdaily.com/979786/forest-pavilion-the-forestias-tk-studio. This project sees itself as a prototype of living with nature. The pavilion is currently the sales gallery for an urban development around a forest zone, something like a real estate office, and will be converted into The Forestias Ecosystem Learning Center for sharing knowledge of forest ecosystem, and be a hub of residence society for joyful moments. It is to be a centre for happiness, with happiness (being) a simple yet powerful manifesto advocated in The Forestias. Sales seems to be the core hope of this blurb that uses nature as an attractive background for customers to envisage idyllic enjoyment. Is it just a ploy? The link to nature seems to something other than some meaningful guide rooted in meaning; just part of the hype needed to attract people, like moths to a flame - this dynamic forest-like landscape is a living paradise creating biodiversity that will grow and evolve along with the current and future generations seems to say it all just too much. There appears to be a core lack of commitment to nature here, just the desire to harness its qualities, as one might blandly do with a hydro power station.
The headline of the third report noticed that day - https://www.yankodesign.com/2022/04/24/architecture-meets-nature-in-these-biophilic-designs/ - seemed to complete the theme of things ‘natural’ with a set of projects: ARCHITECTURE MEETS NATURE IN THESE BIOPHILIC DESIGNS. There are ten projects that involve ‘nature;’ but what is biophilic? The Mirriam-Webster describes it as:
biophilic
adjective
bio· phil· c | \ ˌbī-ō-ˈfi-lik \
Definition of biophilic
: of, relating to, or characterized by biophilia : relating to, showing, or being the human tendency to interact or be closely associated with other forms of life in nature. The biophilic tendency is nevertheless so clearly evinced in daily life and widely distributed as to deserve serious attention. It unfolds in the predictable fantasies and responses of individuals from early childhood onward.— E. O. WilsonHowever, the emerging concept of biophilic design recognizes how much human physical and mental well-being relies on the quality of our relationships to the natural world.— Lindsey Blomberg
First Known Use of biophilic
1932, in the meaning defined above.
The
headline seems to be making some substantial claims for the ten
buildings that it lists: closely associated with other
forms of life in nature. These
are:
1. The Slope House
2. Easyhome Huanggang Vertical Forest City Complex
3. Hugging House
4. Playa Viva
5. The Holiday Home
6. The Playground Restaurant
7. Mitosis
8. The Tower Flower
9. LivingHomes
10. The House Zero
The Slope House is an exotic structure that has been placed in nature, boasting unusually that natural plants have been added inside the house as a small garden – WOW!, as if this might add to its credentials that appear to be more rooted in shape than location.
The Vertical Forest City Complex seems to be a terrible play on words, with a few pieces of greenery placed on the various levels of a high-rise building in an urban setting – it is hardly a ‘forest,’ and raises every issue mentioned in https://voussoirs.blogspot.com/2022/02/on-vertical-gardens-green-is-good.html.
Hugging House remains an enigma, as it is still only in its conceptual stage. It looks like a house on a slope built around existing trees – a situation that possibly has more to do with necessity than nature.
Playa Viva comprises off-grid treehouse-style villas with roofs shaped like the wings of Mobula Rays. The text explains that the beauty of biophilic architecture is that nature provides the blueprint. It is difficult to say that it does not, but the scheme looks to be dramatically assertive, with rays swimming through the forest. The villas looks more like a tourist attraction than a hymn to nature.
The Holiday Home is a quirky little box in a forest that uses recycled materials as it apparently should: Biophilic and organic architecture tend to rely on disused waste and recycled matter. The project seems to fill a gap in the forest rather than settle into it in any native manner.
The Playground Restaurant is an enigma, as the illustrations show what is described as a cinder block wall with lights in it and a few bits of greenery: nature; biophilic? The claim appears to be exaggerated.
Mitosis is described as a regenerative sustainable living and urban development. It looks more like a scheme with plants around the edge. The words look like journalistic hype: Created with biophilic principles and parametric design tools, the hypnotizing prefab timber modules we see will be optimized to be flexible and scalable. It seems to want everything possible to be read into the project that looks fairly basic once the greenery and decorative timber slats have been removed. Nature seems to lack necessity here.
The Tower Flower looks just too literal a project to even think about it being biophilic. It looks like a tourist attraction – an observation tower and coffee shop, possibly selling souvenirs too. The reference to nature is just too obvious; a cliché.
LivingHomes is a puzzle. It looks like two intersecting boxes plonked on the dunes. It appears to want to claim some closeness to nature because it uses recycled materials.
The Zero House is the last project. Its claim to fame seems to be the 3D-printed concrete walls: see – https://voussoirs.blogspot.com/2022/03/on-3d-printing.html. Just how these hold a close relationship to other forms of life in nature remains unclear. Was there a struggle to find ‘biophilic’ examples?
What seems clear here, in these projects, is that the ‘nature’ link is somewhat superficial; an adopted aside to add something more to a project. Perhaps the reporter was overexcited about discovering a new word - biophilic. The links to nature in these projects is equal to the visual connection seen in the first beach house, somewhat superficial at best; at worst, it is purely there on the basis of something like a pun, with ‘green’ things being referenced, therefore ‘nature;’ either things that are coloured green, or that things that grow.
While design once drew inspiration from nature, it now seems that projects want to draw on nature in order to give the work some intellectual roots – by way of pretence. Theory used to inform design; now thoughtful approaches are extremely thin. They appear to have become a mercurial verbal game that seeks to direct thoughts and visions by alluding to things ‘natural’ as if talking about furnishings or fashion, so that value can be added to hollow beginnings – as if organically; ‘naturally.’
Sadly, it is all rather like applique, with nature being used for its inherent visual qualities, as additional things added on, to be seen in association with designs, rather than being engaged in any integral manner with the concept and strategy. The point is that, instead of adopting nature as a decorative, value-adding backdrop, we do need to try to understand how it once was a rich inspiration for beginnings that held depth in not only the evolution and development of designs, but also in their outcomes# – and it still can be if we ever want to extract ourselves from our indulgent world of ‘like’s, for it is this approach that turns life into an enviable spectacle of self-important self-expression.
#
29 APRIL 22
One has to also mention the writings of Christopher Alexander, his work on the patterns of language and the nature of order: living structures; wholeness; centres; true unfolding; adaptation - all exampled in nature.
In one interview, Alexander noted how “It is difficult to talk about the nature of order without speaking about God.” This understanding is a far cry from visual appreciation or applique.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.