It was Sunday on
Lewis. Alastair Macintosh, a native of Lewis born in Leurbost just
south of Stornoway, in his book Soil and Soul, narrates
how the Sabbath had been very strictly controlled, indeed,
enforced in his youth, with even fishing being banned on this holy
day. In spite of this - perhaps because of it? - Macintosh tells how
he and his friends, as boys, if they were able to elude the
supervision of the minister and managed to catch any fish on a
Sunday, used to tie the fish up by the tail and stake them in the
shallows so that they could be retrieved and declared as a catch on
Monday. Lewis was serious about its Sabbath: the Church of Scotland and the breakaway Free
Church preached strict compliance with the rules for the ‘day of
rest’ as the bible defined it. So one thought that there might
still be something different on Lewis on a Sunday; one did not expect
things to be the same.
Unwittingly, we
innocently readied for our Sunday excursion, day two of our Lewis
sojourn, to explore parts of the island not yet visited, only to
slowly discover a silent, still emptiness, a void, with everything
except churches closed. Perhaps we might have realised that this was
to be the case, as signs telling of opening days and hours never even
bothered to mention Sunday. It could not even be contemplated that
the Sabbath, the Lord’s day, might be for something other than for
rest and church going. It had been noticed how each
little village along the coastline of the island had two churches:
the Church of Scotland and the Free Church of Scotland. ‘Free’
sounded an odd name for an institution promoting such strict obligations for the Sabbath that allowed no cooking,
washing, gardening, fishing – nothing but the church: worship.
Signs frequently noted that services were given in Gaelic. Often
place names were only identified in Gaelic: the language was alive
and well, as were attitudes to Sundays. One could see that the large
car parking areas associated with each church were full. All the
activity centred on the church in what seemed to be a whole-of-day
commitment. This attendance was more than the required one hour for
mass, or the protestant service, after which one could do whatever one fancied, a pattern of
involvement that we see in Australia where church attendance is
falling off steeply.
So our drive
through what felt like a no-man’s-land had no stops other than to
admire and photograph the landscape and the villages – the
astonishing vistas and surprising and quaint details. There was not
one place open for a relaxing coffee or a slow browse – nothing at
all. The ‘CLOSED’ signs were only sometimes on display: everyone,
except visitors, knew the commitment to and the importance of the
Sabbath. In fairness, one has to note that a garage, a petrol
station with its little convenience store on the fringe of Stornoway,
reportedly opened on Sunday, perhaps by way of stubborn protest - the
grist in the mill; the mote in the eye; the local irritant? It
seemed to be the only place that was prepared to trade on this
special day of the week. It was a life-line for visitors who had
arrived without any understanding of Sunday inactivity on the island.
Stornoway and every village was empty. There was no one to be seen
anywhere; and there were very few vehicles on the road. So, after
looking around to convince ourselves that the closures were indeed
universal – there was no one to ask - our plans for our drive
became more straightforward: we would continue without stopping,
apart from the occasional pause for the photograph, and travel to the
northern extremity of the island, to the very top of Lewis. There
would be nothing open to attract or distract us.
The journey took
us through many villages along a narrowing road that eventually led
us onto open, windswept moorlands, over which we continued until we
reached the sign pointing to what was, on the map, the very top of
the island: a northwestern-pointing headland named the Butt of Lewis.
The surprise was that there was a lighthouse here. The sign was
followed, and at the last bend around a hill, it appeared: a large iconic
lighthouse. The low white buildings were obviously a Stevenson
design. The style and detailing were almost identical to that of the
lighthouse at Eshaness in the Shetland Islands, and the many other Stevenson complexes scattered around these rocky shores: see -
http://voussoirs.blogspot.com.au/2015/12/stevensons-lighthouse-eshaness.html Unusually, at the Butt of Lewis, even though positioned on a high headland, just like the
Eshaness lighthouse, the difference was the magnificent tower - it
was much taller, round, and made of face brickwork. Where did the
bricks come from? This was the most remote, northerly region of the
Outer Hebrides. One had not noticed many other brick buildings on
Lewis. The tower was a grand, beautifully detailed and constructed building
having something of a Greenway character. One was reminded of Francis
Greenway’s churches: St. James’ in Sydney and St. Matthew’s at
Windsor. Was it the soft, handmade texture of the brickwork and its
earthy, ruddy, clay colouring that one recalled; or the brick tower form? The site held
the character of convict Sydney: brick and white-painted buildings.
St. James' Church, Sydney
St. Matthew's Church, Windsor
Cadnam's Cottage, The Rocks, Sydney
After parking and
admiring the location with its distant horizon that concealed America, attention was again given to the lighthouse and its nearby
complex. It had been seen before: Stephenson style. One wondered again: why choose
brick here? Why face brick? Where were these bricks transported from? Maybe the strength of stone
was not needed on this high cliff as it was at Bell Rock; or was stone not available? But
why height here on this headland? Eshaness lighthouse was located on high cliffs too,
but it has a low, stubby tower, unusually square in plan. A closer
look at the brickwork showed its meticulous laying. There was not a
defect in any alignment or a variation in any curvature that could be
highlighted by the oblique sunlight: yes, it was beautiful, bright, clear but cloudy day. The eye wandered across to the complex of brilliant white
buildings nearby. The structures were all very well kept, displaying
the identical standard Stevenson colours – white walls
with ochre trims.
Flemish bond
Strolling around
the gleaming, walled enclosure, trying to avoid the beautiful wild
flowers in the damp fields of the bleak and blustery moorlands - the
pink ragged robins, the yellow and white irises, the pretty lemon
primroses, and the fresh buttercups - one saw how all of the associated buildings were typical
‘Eshaness’ in style, complete with the window trim, chimney pots, and downpipe accessories. The Stevensons clearly had a handbook of
standard details that they used over and over again. They built many
lighthouses in Scotland and its outer isles; but there was an
interesting difference here in all of this sameness. Not only did this complex have a grand
stair that appeared to be out of character with the otherwise raw,
rigorous functional detailing demanded by engineering necessity
alone, but it also had a variation in the parapet treatment. The
stair seemed to be something that the Stevensons did not encounter on
any regular basis, so it lacked any reference in the pattern books.
It looked out of place, like an approach to a grand country house
that was something else more private and utilitarian. One
was reminded of the chunky stair at the Whalsay kirk: see -
http://voussoirs.blogspot.com.au/2013/02/whalsays-kirk.html
The access was different to the stairs with 365 risers leading up
the high rock to the lighthouse on Muckle Flugga that were made for
climbing alone. There was nothing to ‘style’ on this rugged
outcrop at the very tip of Shetland other than purpose and safety.
Eshaness lighthouse showing stepped gutter detail at corner with the black membrane roof above,
and the square, squat tower.
Had the
Stevensons learned something from the roof detail at Eshaness? The
guise only became evident when looking at the Northmavine
photographs, trying to understand how the roof edge detailing had
resolved the starkly expressive horizontal massing while accommodating the falls in the roof. How did the Eshaness roof drain when there was
no apparent upstand or fall on this horizontal plane? What a close
study of the images revealed was a clever, almost tricky detail that
placed an unnecessary gutter higher on the western side where it was
a mere trim concealing the depth of the fall. The step down to the
alignment of the horizontal gutter on the east, the true catchment
channel, occurred at the north and south corners. Above these
decorative horizontal gutter lines on the north and south elevations,
the thin black wedge of the roof was revealed to the inquisitive eye.
The eye ‘never saw’ this subtle variation in horizontal
expression on site, confirming the very best tradition of builder’s
expectations: “You’ll never see it” - the off-quoted statement
by builders justifying their messy mistakes or more ‘inventive’
work that seeks to dismiss all critiques of concern and demands for
change. The reputation of builders was once scripted in The Bill
as: “He’s a builder.
He has a degree in excuses.” The script writer must have had some
experience with builders!
At the Butt of
Lewis, the membrane of the flat roof was wrapped around the parapet instead of, as at Eshaness, rolling it into a gutter-edge wall trim fitted, and carefully juggled in height, to provide the strong
horizontal alignments disguising the flat falls in the membrane roof
with a considered charade. The Lewis detail, while not as prim or
shrewd, seemed to be a better, a more practical and functional
solution to managing waterproofing in high winds and the exposure to the raging waters that could reach the top of the
headland in serious weather events. One can see the rocks thrown up
by the waters in both locations. The rust marks on the walls of Eshaness display one problem with the gutter trim that the Butt of Lewis lighthouse buildings do not have.
At Lewis, the
stark heights became physically evident as one completed the
circumnavigation of the secured complex and arrived at the slab of
the previous lighthouse on the site, a small concrete platform that
led one precariously close to the rocky, vertical drop into the
raging waters splashing below. This was the Atlantic meeting land. If
one was to get back to where one had started beside the beautiful
brick tower, one had to bravely transverse this pad that exposed body
and soul to eternity without the protection of any ‘Workplace
Health & Safety’ barrier – handrail or otherwise. There was
just a small sign warning of the obvious danger. The irony was that
one had to hesitate, pause to read the message rather than move
across as quickly as possible.
While the
lighthouse and its outbuildings were substantially the same as those
seen in Shetland, making one feel happily acquainted with everything,
the landscape was only superficially similar. The Lewis landscape
was bare, rolling hills, peat-land brown in colour with a light
coverage of grass, sometimes heather: but it felt differently. Has land something of
its history embodied in its substance and form - its feel; its
experience? This land has heard the Gaelic voice and felt its power,
while providing place for its being and burials. Many things were
identical, but the difference with Shetland place was significant, yet difficult to articulate: was it the light? This was Lewis. Only
later during our stay were we to understand the difference with
Harris, even though the puzzle of the twin-named island remained with
us. It was a complication embodied in its tweed too, the craft of
home weaving that takes place predominantly on Lewis, but carries the
name ‘Harris’ tweed because it was originally exported south
through Tarbert in the southern part of the island named Harris. Like Guinness in
Ireland, Harris Tweed is everywhere across Lewis/Harris. The cynic
might ask if it is indeed possible for such quantities to come from
local wool, let alone local weavers. What seems to be the excessive,
over-use of the Harris label does not add confidence to how one is
supposed to understand tweed provenance.
After reviewing
the prospect, we returned to the car and drove off slowly. One could
admire this place for hours, but there was more to see. This is the
classic dilemma of the serious tourist: the juggling of
time and commitment, trying to ensure that the world is not
trivialised into things for entertainment, perceived as a bucket
list of enjoyable ‘interesting’ distractions to be ticked off, discarded, and forgotten in the excitement of the anticipation of the next scheduled item. We
had the whole day to ourselves, this quiet Sabbath. We meandered
through little villages, detouring whenever and however, discovering
hidden streets and lanes lined with homes, schools and surprising
sports halls. Each community was named; each had its special
character; each had its churches; few had any shops or other
facilities. Tesco in Stornoway delivered across the island! The
internet had transformed local shopping.
The pattern of
settlement made one think of the clearances, how crofters had been
forced to the sea, to the poor lands at the fringes on the island, to
fish and burn kelp for the Laird who ran sheep on the emptied
homelands until Australia flooded the market with its cheaper
product. This was a true ‘fringe,' a strip development
that was the result of these clearances. It seemed as though folk
had worked hard to maintain a social identity in all of this chaos.
The pattern was simple, always linear. It was a layout with origins that could still be seen
in the blackhouse settelements: see -
http://voussoirs.blogspot.com.au/2016/12/the-arnol-blackhouse-place-culture.html
Where there was a road, there were homes along each side at nodal
points, with runrig subdivisions stretching from the houses looking
like the legs of a caterpillar slowly moving over a vast landscape.
Each community, either on hill or in valley, was dominated by the
churches. One could envisage the necessity in the rudimentary planning of the crofters who hastily lined up shelters, one beside the
other, around the lane that gave access to the sea, providing a
simple diagram for uncharted growth and expansion.
'Caterpillar' development
The Sunday drive
took us along vacant streets. There was no one around to be seen or
heard. All of the cars appeared to be parked at the churches, like
vehicles around regional shopping centres, such were the numbers: but
Tesco was only in Stornoway. The activities reminded one of the 1950s
in Australia when the Sabbath was also kept as the day of worship and rest. There was something rigorous here on Lewis that one could
admire. One was prompted to wonder what we had lost: a day of quiet;
‘of rest.’ What did the ‘everything open’ approach to the
Sabbath today do to us? Could/should Sunday not be a reminder of
something otherwise, like the Muslim call to prayer that brings mystery to
mind again and again, and relates it to solar time and place: to
beginnings; origins: “Oh, ye of little faith.”
We drove home to rest and eat, and to
watch tennis on the television: Wimbledon – hummm; heathens? We passed
remnants of blackhouse walls covered in shrubs and bushes, scattered
reminders of other times. One could live gently here on Lewis, with an
easy satisfaction mediated by hills: I will lift up mine eyes unto
the hills, from whence cometh my help. Psalm 121 (KJV). There was
a spirit of care; of consideration here. Maybe it was that this
rigour was so complete that one felt happy about it: gratified. Chaos
and tension would develop if many acted otherwise, contrary to the
believers, to indulge their own variety of interests willy-nilly. Indeed, we experience this conflict on every Sabbath at home, in Australia,
where everyone concentrates on personal involvements irrespective of
the other: sport; shopping; swimming; worship; racing; etc. - creating a diversity of tensions and emotional collisions. Might the peace of the Sabbath ever be regained:
contentment? - see:
http://voussoirs.blogspot.com.au/2016/12/are-smart-cities-numb-to-possibilities.html
May serenity remain to be experienced at Lewis – a place of Gaelic
wonder echoing with a past of glory and struggle, enriched with
voices of protest and poetry, and song, creating the land for the
Stevenson lighthouse to define and declare.
One wonders, did
the Stevensons enjoy their work that took them to the very remotest
corners of Britain? Were they sensitive to the locals; the place; the
lives? Their work shows no regional identity, just standard Stevenson
stubbornness and rigour. They were professional lighthouse builders,
not anthropologists. They built for the safety of mariners, providing
buildings around the Scottish coastline, machines that could withstand the elements and the tests
of time. Theirs is a remarkable story: the building of remarkable
lighthouses that can still astonish.
P.S.
Bell Rock lighthouse
One has to note
that Stevenson, when building the Bell Rock lighthouse, had to get
the agreement of his men to work on Sundays so as to make progress
when foundation work could only take place at low tide. There was a
protest, but Stevenson eventually gained the respect of his men on
this testing project.
Muckle Flugga lighthouse
On gaining the
commission for the construction of the Muckle Flugga lighthouse,
Stevenson (one should read ‘the company’ as it was a family
affair covering generations, see below) wrote a report saying that
the task was impossible on this remote, isolated, steep, rocky
outcrop. He was told to go and do it: he did.
See: Bella
Bathurst The Lighthouse Stevensons Harper Collins 2005
- the story of this family of engineers.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.