Friday 5 February 2016

THE PROBLEMS OF GAINING KNOWLEDGE – A REVIEW OF A CPD OFFER

There is no intent to belittle or denigrate anyone or anything in this review. One feels like John Soane here:

And if in the endeavour to discharge the duties of my situation, as pointed out by the laws of this Institution, I shall be occasionally compelled to refer to the works of living artists, I beg to assure them that, whatever observation I may consider necessary to make, they will arise out of absolute necessity, and not from any disposition or intention on my part merely to point out what I may think defects in their compositions. For no man can have a higher opinion of the talents and integrity of the architects of the present time than myself, nor be more anxious on all occasions to do justice to their merits and fair pretensions to fame.

Sir John Soane The Royal Academy Lectures edited by David Watkin Cambridge University Press 2000 p.29

Why are CPD providers not accredited by the Board?

Would it make a difference?

Indeed, the matter that is of importance here is the substance and quality of CPD offerings, nothing more or less. The Board of Architects of Queensland has declared that, to have any registration renewed, an architect has to accrue a minimum of ten formal CPD points, and ten informal CPD points per annum. Just what might be involved in this situation is explained in the Board's guide, Information Sheet 1 - see: http://www.boaq.qld.gov.au/Content/NavigationMenu/Resources/ContinuingProfessionalDevelopment/Qld_Info_Sheet_1_-_Practising_Architects_and_CPD.pdf The Board offers nothing further; neither does it supervise offerings, nor accredit any provider of educational sessions that claim to be of sufficient quality to allow an attendee to add a specified number of particular points to the annual count. The issue seems to be that the new CPD rules are generating what might be seen as just 'business opportunities.' The problem that is sought to be highlighted here is that of quality. If the CPD point system is not going to fall into the farcical situation where architects turn up to anything that might claim to be point-worthy, that could be a most mundane and irrelevant presentation but still count, then the Board surely has to question its modus operandi and establish rigorous rules and manage circumstances so that the profession might be able to truly benefit from the CPD requirements and the associated events.

Currently one sees situations promoted that, in earlier CPD-free times, were merely manufacturers' promotional days that encouraged attendance with lunches; perhaps an after-hours beer. Now the tables have turned. Manufacturers are now being begged to participate to provide opportunities for CPD points. When this observation was jokingly made to a representative of a large company who was due to speak at a recent CPD session, the speaker shrugged and said that no one had asked the company to provide lunch! One guesses that it might have been happy to do so. Ah! Those were the days. One can recall long, happy Christmas lunches provided by manufacturers as a 'thank you' for using and specifying their products throughout the year. The potential moral 'outrage' or the sense of 'bribery' in this situation was never questioned or raised: it really was a simple, honest and welcome “Thank You.” Today there would be many questions about this, maybe a Royal Commission, such is our supercilious political correctness.

The tables have been reversed. Now we pay to listen to promotional propaganda just because the Board has established this new regime – well, has now started enforcing the Act, but, it has to be emphasised, only in part: see - http://voussoirs.blogspot.com.au/2012/05/who-or-what-is-architect.html Why? So it was of interest to receive the E-mail from the Australian Green Development Forum, specifically the Green Speed Learning Forum – CPD Events, that told of a talk, the GSLF Feb 10, 2016: Sustainability Master Planning, Mixed Use City Scape. Does one have to point out to the author of this promotional piece spruiking educational benefits, that 'mixed-use' is hyphenated, and that 'cityscape' is one word? This is the beginning of the problem that lies at the heart of the concern: one is expected to pay to attend a one-hour talk to gather formal points, a talk that starts with a problem and might possibly continue likewise. Why should one bother with wasting time and money when one starts correcting the expression/understanding from the very beginning? Why pretend that one has learnt anything? It seems that just by completing the worksheets provided that one can get the extra couple of points added to the chart that one is asked to keep. This is where the farce starts. One begins by correcting the promotion, and one is likely to continue to remain critical and to do likewise throughout the whole involvement with the event.

This particular talk is one by a Mr. John Tuxworth, the Managing Director of BE Collective: see - http://becollective.net/About/PeopleJohnTuxworth.aspx Now one has to say that this commentary has nothing personal to do with Mr. Tuxworth. The promotion is being used as a typical example only. The matter is CPD quality. In amongst all of the impressive information that the promo chooses to present on Mr. Tuxworth, including dropping the names of Erskine, Foster and Rogers, the AGDF fails to inform the recipient of the E-mail that Mr. Tuxworth is on the Board of Directors of the AGDF: see - https://au.linkedin.com/in/john-tuxworth-4151a014

This fact only came out of a further search on the speaker, to learn more about this individual. Why was this omitted? Other material that came out of more searches included information on his company: see - http://becollective.net/Projects.aspx One looked into this to see if the talk might be worth going to. Everything sounded more than impressive. Even the worksheets appeared to suggest an exuberant brilliance with phrases like: 'a very professional project proposal; architectural experience and knowledge gained about multi use, high density inner city developments; communication, cooperation and professionalism; international ratings tools, high level presentations examples.' If one overlooked the lack of the hyphens in 'high-density,' 'high-level' and 'inner-city,' one might be impressed and even consider attending the talk.

The company site was opened: what was this? One saw an 'engineered' page with a mixture of different projects designed by various architectural firms that had asked BE Collective to participate in these works. To be fair, one could say that the projects were not astonishing. Indeed, nor should they have to be; but we had been primed to expect the unexpected in the CPD talk promo - 'high level': (yes, the hyphen is again missing). There was disappointment. What was extremely 'very professional' here that might stun, amaze with its 'international' quality? What examples of 'high level presentations' were there to be observed and learned from here? What unique example of 'professionalism' might there be in the BE Collective web site that might stimulate one to do likewise? What special 'architectural experience and knowledge' was there from which one might glean 'new knowledge'? Surely one might expect something spectacular after the CPD hype?

One does not have to further analyse the subject. The link is http://becollective.net/Projects.aspx Just have a look. The whole is a sad disappointment after such an introduction. There is little transformative or special here. There does not have to be, but the CPD promo suggested otherwise. Indeed, the site seemed to try just too hard to impress. One project was illustrated with drainage pipes; another a fairly ordinary Gold Coast development; yet another showed a coloured, 3D structural diagram; and so on. It is all a little puzzling. The point being made here is not a singular criticism of BE Collective; it is to highlight the apparent exaggeration of the AGDF promo; the strangely named 'Green Speed Learning Forum' that appears specifically set up to offer 'CPD Events' – sessions that allow architects to tick boxes to accumulate required CPD points: the 'business' side of the group.

While the ADGF might like to make the promoted one-hour lunchtime talk sound amazing so as to attract attention, one has to note that there could be some self-interest here that does not appear to be a special search for quality. Mr. Tuxworth is on the Board of Directors of the ADGF; the event has a price of $27.12 for non-members – why exactly $27.12?; and the hype seems to lack any supporting evidence: the web site of BE Collective does not really appear to support the enthusiastic descriptions, (with or without hyphens), in the flyer. In spite of all of this, the event will accrue two formal CPD points for attendees. One assumes this to be so: the promo never really specifies the point rating or count, but it must be so: why else attend as a paying non-member and complete a worksheet? Does the Board care that the CPD process might have become a charade?

In spite of all of this, the 'learning experience' is boldly promised in a naive, questionable expression, minus the hyphens:

Learning Outcome:

Participants shall:

Obtain new knowledge and able to understand how to contribute towards and develop a very professional project proposal
Share architectural experience and knowledge of multi use, high density inner city developments
Contribute to a better understanding (improved) skills of communication, cooperation and professionalism
Improved skills through a better understanding of international ratings tools, high level presentations

Is this really likely? Who will gauge the relevance of this experience? How can such an outcome be predicted when neither the title of the talk nor the worksheet and learning experiences can be presented correctly? One has to remain cynical with such a state of affairs.

The whole situation is very embarrassing. Even overlooking the quality of expression and poor spelling, one feels as though architects are being treated as school children might be, with a set of simplistic tasks identified on formal work sheets to be completed during the talk to confirm the 'learning experience.' It is as if one has to prove that one did indeed attend the session; that one was not asleep; and that one did fully comprehend the issues being presented on 'High Density Mixed Use City Scape.' It all gets very close to being insulting. Surely the profession deserves better than this in every way?

If the Board is truly interested in quality CPD outcomes, then it has to take action itself to set the example, and to supervise the presentations and outcomes. Allowing 'Speed Learning' promos to seemingly hype up ordinary situations with wrong spelling looks to be a situation that will only add to the questioning pessimism that is growing throughout the profession. A colleague recently told me of an experience at a CPD Green Speed Learning talk: the friend sitting next to him was diligently completing his worksheet before to the speaker had started the talk. The colleague looked on puzzled, and asked naively, “How do you know what to write when he has not yet begun?”

“Oh,” said the friend, “You take all of this CPD stuff just too seriously!”

If this is what CPD point collection has come to, then one has to ask: why is such silliness perpetuated? If the Board is happy with this meaningless game, then it can keep doing what it is doing. If it is seeking something truly substantive, then the provision of CPD opportunities has to change. One can recall an era of free monthly talks for the profession that were given by invited guests and international architects who might be travelling in Australia. These stunning evenings were presented and attended by many just for the love of and interest in architecture. Now that the CPD rules are insisted upon and policed by the Board in a strict, legalistic, schoolteacher-like manner, many talks and presentations are attended only in order to achieve the cheapest and easiest points possible. It is a truly sad state of affairs that can really only be overcome by the Board itself that should begin its own quality presentations throughout the state. Gosh, it really is just not good enough for the Board to boldly threaten and reprimand architects with brash statements of demand that repeatedly remind that the declaration of points is a legal requirement, with any false statement being punishable at law; and that distance is no excuse.

Really, the Board has to know that there is no excuse for hyped-up presentations to be pushed as point-winning periods just to add to the count. This silliness merely perpetuates the nonsense of the point chaser, who is determined to tick boxes as simply and ineffectively as possible. Meaning and quality have no role in this farce that is interested in quantity only. Surely the whole ambition of the CPD philosophy is that the architectural profession will learn, will grow in meaning, strength and understanding, and respect, with a specific, well-managed, caring CPD regime. If the search for value and understanding is being turned into a cynical, legalistic farce, as it appears to be, then things need to change – NOW: or am I taking things just too seriously?

THE TALK

Australian Green Development Forum
Green Speed Learning Forum - CPD Events
cpdevents@agdf.org.au

View this email in your browser

GSLF Feb 10, 2016
Sustainability Master Planning, Mixed Use City Scape

John Tuxworth - Managing Director of BE Collective

Overview:
The presentation will explore John's recent experience as a consultant for the Buchan group on a massive development proposal in Bangkok. It will focus on John's contributions towards the environmentally sustainable development of this mixed use high density inner city development.

Learning Outcome:
Participants shall:

Obtain new knowledge and able to understand how to contribute towards and develop a very professional project proposal
Share architectural experience and knowledge of multi use, high density inner city developments
Contribute to a better understanding (improved) skills of communication, cooperation and professionalism
Improved skills through a better understanding of international ratings tools, high level presentations

Presentation and Interactive Workshop
Presenter: John Tuxworth - Managing Director of BE Collective
Academic Qualifications: B Eng GCertMan MIEAust MIStructE RPEQ NPER GSAP
Technical: John contributes technically across structural, civil, hydraulic & ESD disciplines. John’s tertiary education started at QUT’s school of Civil Engineering where he completed his Bachelor of Civil Engineering. Following this John spent several years abroad working for Maunsell (Aecom) in Indonesia, Waterman Partnership in London, and Michael Punch and Partners in Dublin. Whilst in London John became one of the youngest Chartered Structural Engineers by passing the exclusive Institute of Structural Engineers Part 3 Exam. In 1999 this exam was 7.5 hours long with a 64% failure rate.

Practical Expertise: John’s interest in becoming a multi-discipline building professional saw him complete a year of architectural studies at the University of Westminster in London. He has also undertaken MBA studies through Latrobe University. John’s first involvement with ESD in the built environment was whilst working on the Greenwich Millennium Village Project in 1998, with renowned architect, Ralph Erskine. His formidable time whilst in the UK also saw John also working on projects by Norman Foster (University of East London, Docklands Campus), and Richard Rogers (Montevetro high-rise at Battersea). John is one of the few structural/civil engineers to be accredited as a Green Star Professional.

Please CLICK HERE to register your seat now!
Please CLICK HERE to download your worksheet for the Feb 10, 2016 event.

Competency Unit: DESIGN

WORKSHEET

GSLF Feb 10, 2016 CPD Workshop Worksheet

How do you contribute towards and develop a very professional project proposal?

Detail some architectural experience and knowledge gained about multi use, high density inner city developments.

What is your understanding of communication, cooperation and professionalism?

What are some international ratings tools, high level presentations examples?

$27.12GET TICKETS

SHARE
SAVE THIS EVENT

GSLF - Sustainability Master Planning, Mixed Use City Scape

Wed, 10/02/2016 at 12:30 PM - Brisbane CBD, QLD

$27.12GET TICKETS

Event Information

Event Description

Overview:

The presentation will explore John's recent experience as a consultant for the Buchan group on a massive development proposal in Bangkok. It will focus on John's contributions towards the environmentally sustainable development of this mixed use high density inner city development.

Learning Outcome:

Participants shall:

Obtain new knowledge and able to understand how to contribute towards and develop a very professional project proposal
Share architectural experience and knowledge of multi use, high density inner city developments
Contribute to a better understanding (improved) skills of communication, cooperation and professionalism
Improved skills through a better understanding of international ratings tools, high level presentations

Presentation and Interactive Workshop
Presenter: John Tuxworth - BE Collective
Academic Qualifications: B Eng GCertMan MIEAust MIStructE RPEQ NPER GSAP
Technical: John contributes technically across structural, civil, hydraulic & ESD disciplines. John’s tertiary education started at QUT’s school of Civil Engineering where he completed his Bachelor of Civil Engineering. Following this John spent several years abroad working for Maunsell (Aecom) in Indonesia, Waterman Partnership in London, and Michael Punch and Partners in Dublin. Whilst in London John became one of the youngest Chartered Structural Engineers by passing the exclusive Institute of Structural Engineers Part 3 Exam. In 1999 this exam was 7.5 hours long with a 64% failure rate.

Practical Expertise:

John’s interest in becoming a multi-discipline building professional saw him complete a year of architectural studies at the University of Westminster in London. He has also undertaken MBA studies through Latrobe University. John’s first involvement with ESD in the built environment was whilst working on the Greenwich Millennium Village Project in 1998, with renowned architect, Ralph Erskine. His formidable time whilst in the UK also saw John also working on projects by Norman Foster (University of East London, Docklands Campus), and Richard Rogers (Montevetro high-rise at Battersea). John is one of the few structural/civil engineers to be accredited as a Green Star Professional.

Competency Unit: Design

WHEN

Wednesday, 10 February 2016 from 12:30 PM to 1:30 PM (AEST) - Add to Calendar

WHERE

Theatrette Room - Brisbane Square Library. 266 George St. Brisbane CBD, QLD 4000 AU -View Map

No comments:

ON GARDENING

I am strongly of the opinion that the possession of a quantity of plants, however good the plants may be themselves and however ample their number, does not make a garden; it only makes a collection. Having got the plants, the great thing is to use them with careful selection and definite intention. Merely having them, or having them planted unassorted in garden spaces, is only like having a box of paints from the best colourman, or, to go one step further, it is like having portions of these paints set out upon a palette. This does not constitute a picture; and it seems to me that the duty we owe our gardens and to our own bettering in our gardens is so to use plants that they shall form beautiful pictures; that, while delighting our eyes, they should be always training those eyes to a more exulted criticism; to a state of mind and artistic conscience that will not tolerate bad or careless combination or any sort of misuse of plants, but in which it becomes a point of honour to be always striving for the best. Gertrude Jekyll Colour in the Flower Garden Mitchell Beazley London 1998 – Introduction (first published 1908)

MORE IS LESS

Significantly, in the era of the ‘information revolution’, the same process is now affecting disinformation: whereas in the past it was lack of information and censorship which characterized the denial of democracy by the totalitarian state, the opposite is now the case. Disinformation is achieved by flooding TV viewers with information, with apparently contradictory data. The truth of the facts is censured by over-information, as we have seen from the press and television discussing the Balkans. The globalitarian state, built out of economic-strategic alliances, is no longer old ‘Anastasia’ with her scissors: it is Babel. Now more is less. And in some cases, less than nothing. Deliberate manipulation and unintentional accidents have become indistinguishable.

Paul Virilio Strategy of Deception Verso 2007 p.48

(first published Editions Galilee 1999)

‘That which precedes the event is not necessarily its cause,’ claims the wisdom of the ancients. p.76

As Negroponte has rightly remarked, with the ‘liberation of information’ on the Web, what is most lacking is meaning or, in other words, a context into which Internet users could put the facts and hence distinguish truth from falsehood. On the Web, where, as everyone knows, the terrorist temptation is constant and where depredations of hackers are committed with impunity in a strange state of legal indeterminacy, the difference between (true) information and (false) deception fades a little more each day. In entering the looking-glass worlds of television and home computers, we are in the end left in the position of Kinglake’s old ‘English soldiery’. As they saw it,

insofar as the battlefield presented itself to the bare eyesight of men, it had no entirety, no length, no breadth, no size, no shape and was made up of nothing . . . In such conditions, each separate gathering . . . went on fighting its own little battle in happy and advantageous ignorance of the general state of the action; nay, even very often in ignorance of the fact that any great conflict was raging.

As Albert Camus asserted: ‘When we are all guilty, that will be true democracy.’ p.78

ENCOUNTERING CONRAD

Ryszard Kapuściński The Other Verso London 2018, p. 92

At the end of his book, Kapuściński asks whether, in our encounters with others in the future:

Will we jointly wish to refer to what – as Conrad puts it - ‘speaks to our capacity for delight and wonder, to the sense of mystery surrounding our lives; to our sense of pity, and beauty, and pain; to the latent feeling of fellowship with all creation – and to the subtle but invincible conviction of solidarity that knits together the loneliness of innumerable hearts: to the solidarity of dreams, in joy, in sorrow, in aspirations, in illusions, in hope, in fear, which binds men to each other, which binds together all humanity – the dead to the living and the living to the unborn.’?*

* J. Conrad, Preface to The Nigger of the ‘Narcissus’: A Tale of the Sea, New York: W.W.Norton, 1979.

Architecture stands in between of all of these circumstances of encounter, but how does it explain itself beyond being a bespoke ‘grand design’ of a potential genius?

ON THE CULTURE OF OTHERS

Herodotus . . . wanted to know them because he understood that to know ourselves we have to know Others, who act as a mirror in which we see ourselves reflected; he knew that to understand ourselves better we have to understand Others, to compare ourselves with them, to measure ourselves against them. As a citizen of the world, he did not believe that we should isolate ourselves from Others, or slam the gates in their faces. Xenophobia, Herodotus implied, is a sickness of people who are scared, suffering an inferiority complex, terrified by the prospect of seeing themselves in the mirror of the culture of Others.

Ryszard Kapuściński The Other Verso London 2018, p. 19

CLEVER PEOPLE SELF-DOUBT

I last met him when Philomena came out back in 2013. Back then, Coogan was a bracing, combative interviewee. He saw every question as a potential ambush and moved to thwart any perceived journalistic angle. Today, though, he seems more comfortable with the process, more at ease with himself. It used to be that he felt he always had to have his guard up. Now he accepts that he can sometimes afford to let it drop. He’s middle aged and a mass of insecurity and contradictions. He suspects that, on balance, that’s not such a terrible thing to be.

“And actually I think acknowledging your own fallibility makes you a better artist and a better person,” he says in a rush. “It’s fairly obvious to me that the real wisdom lies in seeing people’s failings and trying to understand them. Because the alternative is that very childlike, Donald Trump thing of believing that admitting any weakness is fatal. What was it Bukowski said? All the clever people are full of self-doubt and all the stupid people are very confident. That’s the era we’re living in now. That’s the era I don’t want to be a part of. So all you can do is try to go about things differently. Do interesting work and don’t be a cunt.”

Coogan gulps for breath. His eyes widen and then he rocks with laughter. “There you go, that’s my big artistic statement,” he says. “Do interesting work and don’t be a cunt. Took me the best part of an hour. Got there in the end.”

https://www.theguardian.com/film/2019/jan/04/steve-coogan-interview-stan-and-ollie

HILLS

The hills bespeak a healing power and closeness to unseen help now lost in the security of modern welfare. Those who befriend the silent peaks in a lifetime's work know well their embracing strength. (p.91)

For only once is it given to man to lie in the arms of the eternal forces which give all matter form. (p.98)

Iain R Thomson Isolation Shepherd Birlinn, Edinburgh, 2007

I will lift up mine eyes unto the hills, from whence cometh my help.

My help cometh from the Lord, which made heaven and earth.

Psalm 121 King James Version (KJV)

SPAN

17 August 2012

This blog began as a co-operative concept. While the idea and the stimulus was generated through discussion, the blog has turned out to be an individual enterprise. SPAN stands for ‘Spence and’ in the context of others. As a word, it fitted in nicely with the idea of voussoirs - parts and pieces, complete with keystones, that could ‘span’ the gaps in understanding and communication. The word SPAN also allowed for a shared input into a blog.

Spence Jamieson is an architect and the author of these articles. The blogs show the scope of his interests.

THE IDEA

chapters and verses as architectural commentary:

the wedge to isolate, array and shape ideas; the keystone to highlight core, supporting issues. voussoirs is a concept to start an architectural discussion to span the large gap in the debate on things architectural; a bridging of the void in architectural issues by exploring considered bits and pieces. The state of the profession today is highlighted by silence and self. It is introvert and protective. Educational centres remain isolated within their own constructs, being run primarily as businesses. They put very little back into the community. They indulge themselves in their own interests and exclude contrary and different ideas and ideals. They constantly avoid any challenge on concepts or strategies that might change the plotted course. Rarely does comment ever come from this academic world into the public or any arena. Very few publications help direct the public interest. Rarely do newspapers grasp the issues and explore them. One aspect may be given space in the popular press, but architectural debates and concerns are rarely given attention. The professional institutes are doing much the same as the educational institutions. Private practice is doing likewise, offering, if anything, only its own pushy propaganda to the public. Yet there is a discussion and debate in these silences that needs a larger and more open platform. Discussion is alive and well amongst a few in at least one curry house, but the debate needs to be a broadened. voussoirs is the place for this discussion. It is a site for ideas, comment, articles, and critiques on things architectural and associated issues. It is here that matters can be aired and ideas discussed and debated without fear of the neglect and disdain that institutions and private groups and publishers give to open speaking and differing ideas.

There can be no true understanding of any idea if discussion and debate are curtailed in favour of a preferred position.

ON COMMUNICATION

. . . there has been a growing feeling of concern to solve what is now commonly called “the problem of communication.” But if one observes efforts to solve this problem, he will notice that different groups who are trying to do this are not actually able to listen to each other. As a result, the very attempt to improve communication leads frequently to yet more confusion, and the consequent sense of frustration inclines people ever further toward aggression and violence, rather than toward mutual understanding and trust.

David Bohm On Dialogue Routledge, Oxon, 1996 (2004) p.2

ON ART & METHOD

Even in relationships with inanimate objects and with nature in general, something very like communication is involved. Consider, for example, the work of an artist. Can it be properly said that the artist is expressing himself, i.e., literally “pushing outward” something that is already formed inside him? Such a description is not in fact generally accurate or adequate. Rather, what usually happens is that the first thing the artist does is only similar in certain ways to what he may have in mind. As in a conversation between two people, he sees the similarity and the difference, and from this perception something further emerges in his next action. Thus, something new is continually created that is common to the artist and the material on which he is working.

David Bohm On Dialogue Routledge, Oxon, 1996 (2004) p.4

THE NECESSITY OF THE INCOMPLETE

The early 50's and 60's is a period that is gaining interest in architectural ideas. Perhaps this is why Princeton chose to republish The Tao of Architecture. It is a beautiful little book that discusses the implications of traditional wisdom in architecture. Given the astonishing lack of direction in current architectural theory, the publication is very timely.

Amos Ih Tiao Chang, The Tao of Architecture, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1956, reprinted 2017.

p.26

Laotzu's idea of formation is heavily concerned with emptiness or non-existence. To him who regards nothing as persistent, what is essentially important in things is the possibility of becoming something, not the opportunity of remaining as something confronting deterioration. Consequently, meaningful incompletion is taken as the most desirable state of tangible being.

p.22

. . . the full meaning of existence is beyond the power of any manifestation. What appears tangible, architectural or natural, is only a means to suggest that which is lacking in appearance and existing in man's intangible understanding and aesthetic feeling.

LIVING IN IMPERMANENCE

Maybe it is a good thing for us to keep a few dreams of a house that we shall live in later, always later, so much later, in fact, that we shall not have time to achieve it. For a house that was final, one that stood in symmetrical relation to the house we were born in, would lead to thoughts – serious, sad thoughts – and not to dreams. It is better to live in a state of impermanence than in one of finality.

Gaston Bachelard The Poetics of Space

see: THE NECESSITY OF THE INCOMPLETE in the sidebar

THE REAL AND THE IMAGINARY

I prefer, by far, real islands to imaginary islands, just as I prefer prime documents to novelistic remakes. That's because the real is richer than the imagination. The real demands investigation and is an invitation to sensitive knowledge, whereas the imaginary is more often than not just a collection of stereotypes, a soup of clichés offering an infantile kind of satisfaction. Then, a relationship to the real and its resistance requires changes in thought, in ways of being, in ways of saying, it leads to a transformation of the self. Whereas imagination is nothing but compensation. There's even something horribly autistic about sitting in one spot and spinning out invention by the yard. How much more interesting an open and poetic process involving contemplation, study, movement, meditation and composition.

Kenneth White Across The Territories Travels from Orkney to Rangiroa Polygon Edinburgh 2004 p.86

VISION, CIVILIZATION & SPIRIT

The architect who combines in his being the powers of vision, of imagination, of intellect, of sympathy with human need and the power to interpret them in a language vernacular and time - - - is he who shall create poems in stone.

When you look on one of your contemporary 'good copies' of historical remains, ask yourself the question: Not what style, but what civilization is this building? And the absurdity, vulgarity, anachronism and solecism of the modern structure will be revealed to you in a most startling fashion.

It cannot for a moment be doubted that an art work to be alive, to awaken us to life, to inspire us sooner or later with its purpose, must indeed be animate with a soul, must have been breathed upon by the spirit and must breathe in turn that spirit.

Louis Sullivan

AN UNCHANGING PROFESSION

ARCHITECTURAL PRACTICE

. . . no one can relieve (the architect) from the need to rely on his own discretion, for that discretion is linked to a responsibility which belongs to no one but (the architect). It is the exercise of discretion hampered by considerations of cost, of risk, of exact justice, of conflicting interests, of uncertainty as to facts, of misunderstandings and of diverse individualities and dishonest or incapable agents, which is the chief care and preoccupation of architectural practice. To design a building, to draw and specify every part of it, and to direct its construction and see it completed with no other anxieties and dilemmas than belong to the exercise of those duties, is unknown.

H.B.Creswell The Honeywood Settlement Faber and Faber Limited London 1967 (fourth edition: first edition 1930 Architectural Press) p.128

MENDING WALL

Something there is that doesn't love a wall,
That sends the frozen-ground-swell under it,
And spills the upper boulders in the sun,
And makes gaps even two can pass abreast.
The work of hunters is another thing:
I have come after them and made repair
Where they have left not one stone on a stone,
But they would have the rabbit out of hiding,
To please the yelping dogs. The gaps I mean,
No one has seen them made or heard them made,
But at spring mending-time we find them there.
I let my neighbor know beyond the hill;
And on a day we meet to walk the line
And set the wall between us once again.
We keep the wall between us as we go.
To each the boulders that have fallen to each.
And some are loaves and some so nearly balls
We have to use a spell to make them balance:
'Stay where you are until our backs are turned!'
We wear our fingers rough with handling them.
Oh, just another kind of out-door game,
One on a side. It comes to little more:
There where it is we do not need the wall:
He is all pine and I am apple orchard.
My apple trees will never get across
And eat the cones under his pines, I tell him.
He only says, 'Good fences make good neighbors'.
Spring is the mischief in me, and I wonder
If I could put a notion in his head:
'Why do they make good neighbors? Isn't it
Where there are cows?
But here there are no cows.
Before I built a wall I'd ask to know
What I was walling in or walling out,
And to whom I was like to give offence.
Something there is that doesn't love a wall,
That wants it down.' I could say 'Elves' to him,
But it's not elves exactly, and I'd rather
He said it for himself. I see him there
Bringing a stone grasped firmly by the top
In each hand, like an old-stone savage armed.
He moves in darkness as it seems to me~
Not of woods only and the shade of trees.
He will not go behind his father's saying,
And he likes having thought of it so well
He says again, "Good fences make good neighbors."

Robert Frost

CATHEDRALS and SYMBOLISM

Everything is the symbolical representation of an idea. p.28

The same artists, who had to follow a strict rule when treating the history of God, could use all of their imagination when treating the ornamental: whence the blossoming of the grotesque and the original. p.38

In those days religion, drama, and art had the same aim and sought to provoke the same thoughts. They did not pretend to amuse the people; they endeavoured to teach them. p.51

This way of thinking and reasoning takes sometimes a very subtle turn. p.53

Hélène Fouré The French Cathedrals Their Symbolic Significance Bruce Humphries Inc. Publishers, Boston, 1931

THE COMPLIMENT & THE CRITIC 2

ON DEMOLISHING BUILDINGS

Nothing appears to me much more wonderful, than the remorseless way in which the educated ignorance, even of the present day, will sweep away an ancient monument, if its preservation be not absolutely consistent with immediate convenience or economy. Putting aside all antiquarian considerations, and all artistical ones, I wish that people would only consider the steps, and the weight of the following very simple argument. You allow that it is wrong to waste time, that is, your own time; but then it must be still more wrong to waste other people’s; for you have some right to your own time, but none to their’s. Well, then, if it is thus wrong to waste the time of the living, it must be still more wrong to waste the time of the dead; for the living can redeem their time, the dead cannot. But you waste the best of the time of the dead when you destroy the works they have left you; for those works they gave the best of their time, intending them for immortality.

John Ruskin Lectures on Architecture George Routledge & Sons Limited, London p.109

THE COMPLIMENT & THE CRITIC 1

How to avoid insult

But how much of nature have you in your Greek buildings? I will show you, taking for an example the best you have lately built; and, in doing so, I trust that nothing that I say will be thought to have any personal purpose, and that the architect of the building in question will forgive me; for it is just because it is a good example of the style that I think it more fair to use it for an example. If the building were a bad one of the kind, it would not be a fair instance; and I hope, therefore, that in speaking of the institution on the mound, just in progress, I shall be understood as meaning rather a compliment to its architect than otherwise. It is not his fault that we force him to build in the Greek manner.

John Ruskin Lectures on Architecture and Painting George Routledge & Sons Limited; New York: F.P.Dutton & CO - p.64-65

ON EDUCATION

'. . those who are responsible for giving instruction in the theory of architecture should be practising architects. The warning is necessary because, strange though it may seem, English schools of architecture to-day tend to be run by men who either do not practise at all, or whose practices are for them a very subsidiary spare-time occupation. Often a teaching appointment is a means by which a clever student avoids the humiliation of entering an office as a junior assistant, thus depriving himself of the only opportunity he will ever have of learning something of the practical side of his profession from the bottom upwards. There can be no doubt whatever that the teaching of theory has suffered severely as a result of this habit: and this leads me to the conclusion that no man should be permitted to teach until he is recognized by his Faculty as a Master of Theory and Practice. In other words, he should be not only a practising architect but also, what is unfortunately a much rarer specimen, a good architect.'

W.A. Eden, The Process of Architectural Tradition, Macmillian & Co. Ltd, London, 1942, p.p. 86-87

ETHICS

Thus Pugin laid the foundation stones of that strange system which dominates the nineteenth-century art criticism and is immortalised in the Seven Lamps of Architecture: the value of a building depends on the moral worth of its creator; and a building has a moral value independent of, and more important than, its esthetic value. We must not consider this emphasis on morality peculiarly Victorian. Whenever esthetic standards are lost, ethical standards rush in to fill the vacuum; for the interest in esthetics dwindles and vanishes, but the interest in ethics is eternal.

Kenneth Clark The Gothic Revival - An Essay in the History of Taste, (1^st edition Constable 1928); third edition John Murray 1962, reprinted 1974, p.149.

MODERNITY

The everyday is covered by a surface: that of modernity. News stories and the turbulent affectations of art, fashion, and event veil without ever eradicating the everyday blahs. Images, the cinema and television divert the everyday by at times offering up to its own spectacle, or sometimes the spectacle of the distinctly noneveryday; violence, death, catastrophe, the lives of kings and stars – those who we are led to believe defy everydayness. Modernity and everydayness constitute a deep structure that a critical analysis can work to uncover.

Henri Lefebvre, The Everyday and Everydayness, in Stephen Harris and Deborah Berke, Architecture of the Everyday, Princeton Architectural Press, New York, 1997, p.37.

NAMING

The simplest act of substitution is to put the name of a maker in the place of his or her work, which amounts to a paraphrase in itself. . . . All paraphrase sets aside the original: To put the name in place of the painting is to remove it from immediate consciousness; to narrate the life of an individual is an act profoundly different from looking into a painting and one that cannot be conducted simultaneously with it. To substitute a temporal narrative, already present in a name, for the physical work of art is to give up those features of the thing that were transient and unrepeatable, bound to a moment that is irrevocably ended; the unique insistence is, for the moment at least, sacrificed on the altar of continuity.

Thomas Crow, The Intelligence of Art, The University of North Carolina Press, 1999, p.1.

ON BRANDING

Branding is now the art of getting people to think what something might be rather than what it necessarily is. It's about the manipulation of the virtual reality in which so many live. The manipulators include anyone with an interest in what we might think of them - not just big companies with products to sell but political parties with votes to win, design gurus with clients to attract - anyone, in other words, acting in some kind of market. They all have an interest in controlling their appearance to make us believe it is the reality.

John Humphrys Beyond Words How Language Reveals The Way We Live Now Hodder and Stoughton. Great Britain 2006, p. 86-87

see:

http://voussoirs.blogspot.com.au/2015/10/faking-provenance-misuse-of-meaning.html

PRECONCEPTION

Leone Huntsman Sand in Our Souls The Beach in Australian History Melbourne University Press 2001, p.16:

Thus first impressions were filtered through existing preconceptions, starkly revealed in Sir Joseph Banks's description of the people seen from Captain James Cook's Endeavour when it first touched on the Australian continent in 1770:

In the morn we . . . [discerned] 5 people who appeared through our glasses to be enormously black: so far did the prejudices which we had built on Dampier's account influence us that we fancied we could see their Colour when we could scarce distinguish whether or not they were men.

Here Banks refers to William Dampier's unfavourable accounts of the West Australian aboriginal people in published accounts of his landings in 1688 and 1699, and reveals his own awareness of the extent to which perception was influenced by expectation.

see: http://voussoirs.blogspot.com.au/2014/04/seeing-what-we-believe-idyllic-visions.html

THE MUSE - GETTING IT RIGHT

"It can be in the morning, any old time, I wake up with an idea and it starts following you around.

"You go, 'Ah that's good' because you know when it's going to work, it's going to be fruitful.

"Other times you'll get the edge of an idea and maybe it fades away or there's just no way it can be made to serve, you know?

"Then you just, it takes its time and you work on it and if necessary you work on it more than once. I'm known to work on it two or three times before you get it right."

Les Murray

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-10-02/les-murray-latest-volume-reflects-on-bunyah/6816714

http://www.lesmurray.org/

JARGON

The world seems to find it necessary to use more and more jargon in general reporting and conversation. It is especially noticed in accounts and discussions on the arts. The ABC TV arts programme presented on 7 January 2017 at 6:15pm had more jargon than usual; indeed, had more unusual expressions than previously encountered, ones that had not been heard before:

"unpicking the tapestry" of one's life;

and

looking at "the fan deck of what you do."

These reminded one of other popular fashionable expressions:

“to unpack an issue,” meaning to analyse it in some detail;

and

“to segue,” meaning to shift to a new topic or activity.

This last term is a favourite of radio announcers. The Italian word is often misspelt as ‘segway’ because of the similar phonetic sounding that is more commonly understood as Segway, the brand of a human transporter.

The parallel is interesting, as the idea of being ‘transported’ is common to both words, but it seems to hold little interest to the radio voices that appear just too cleverly happy with the use of this different, interesting expression.

Friday 5 February 2016

THE PROBLEMS OF GAINING KNOWLEDGE – A REVIEW OF A CPD OFFER

GSLF Feb 10, 2016 Sustainability Master Planning, Mixed Use City Scape

John Tuxworth - Managing Director of BE Collective

No comments: