Thursday, 27 August 2026

COMMUNITY, DESIGN, & COUNTRY


The issue of community in architecture has been raised in various blogs. This has nothing to do with ‘community’ as a functional requirement, as in, say, a community hall or another public building; rather it is referring to that subtle quality of relationship that enables a coherence that embodies integrity in cities, towns, villages, and suburbs. There is the critique that Modernism is singular, concerned only with its own bespoke expression - see: https://voussoirs.blogspot.com/2023/05/architecture-is-not-singular.html and https://voussoirs.blogspot.com/2019/10/the-rose-seidler-house-private-visions.html; and the comment has been made on the collection of houses in The New Queensland House- see: https://voussoirs.blogspot.com/2025/10/the-new-queensland-house.html - where the majority of projects prefer to stand alone in their presentations, (only two reveal the street), and have no relationship to any particular context, or to each other, apart from coming together in this coffee table-like publication under the chosen theme of ‘outdoor living' which arises from various different, bespoke expressions and interpretations.




As well as this preferred singularity, we have that constantly repeated declaration of recognition of First Nations people that has also been critiqued see: https://voussoirs.blogspot.com/2025/09/lagoon-house.html and https://voussoirs.blogspot.com/2025/10/the-new-queensland-house.html - the point being that the ‘recognition’ is merely a set of hollow words,# with no particular action being taken to modify any outcome because of this political blurb; social spin that simply ticks the box to satisfy expectations. The words have become something like the bland, thoughtless 'Thank you' or 'Excuse me' statement that changes nothing that anyone intended to do as they accept or pass by without any thought being given to these sounds. True recognition embodies much more than a polite, cliché gesture. Country holds depth and meaning – see: https://voussoirs.blogspot.com/2024/06/country-outside-inside-place.html and https://voussoirs.blogspot.com/2026/08/indigenising-with-country.html.




Bruce Pascoe, in Dark Emu, Magabala Books 2018, (p.192/3 and p.180), notes that there is inherent meaning in First Nations acts and ideas, recording the fact that there is a moral and spiritual obligation and significance in materials used in tool production, and quoting Stanner who recognised that all myths were archetypal, and 'enfold into some kind of oneness the notions of body spirit, ghost shadow, name, spirit site and totem.'




There is a wholeness in First Nations understanding that could set the example for a more cohesive and meaningful togetherness in architecture, in our cities, towns, villages and suburbs, as is noted in the First Nations obligations with land management:

Bruce Pascoe, Dark Emu, Magabala Books, 2018, p.199:

 The system (of land management) in operation could be considered a jigsaw of mutualism. People had rights and responsibilities for particular pieces of the jigsaw, but they were constrained to operate that piece so that it added to rather than detracted from the pieces of their neighbours and the epic integrity of the land.

The piece of the tree or stream or land that a group retained responsibility for bled into country so distant that they may never visit.



If architects took First Nations matters seriously, and acted likewise, we might have cities, towns, villages and suburbs that truly embody and enrich life, rather than being left with the total shambles that we have today.


Country of the Turrbal and Yuggera peoples.


We have just returned from a day in Brisbane: in spite of the promotional hype declaring it one of Australia's most liveable and happiest cities, the city is a total mess, not only with traffic chaos, but also with egocentric statements of built form seeking to outdo each other without giving any thought, care, or attention to anything but their own itemised, expressive identities revealed as these ‘grand design statements,’ each presenting this egocentric interest in an array of languages, all of which strive for an award winning appraisal with their attempts at displaying anything different and starkly unique. Imagine if architects took responsibility for things so distant that they might never visit. Today, architects struggle to take responsibility for a neighbour let alone some mysteriously envisaged, remote place which is more likely to entail gleeful amazement at the latest Gehry building under construction than any accountability.


Gehry Guggenheim, Abu Dhadi - so distant that they may never visit.


Country of the Turrbal and Yuggera peoples.

So one sees declarations of recognition as hollow, political lies; a pretence. We have much to learn. Unfortunately, Australia cannot even agree to give First Nations people a Voice with an over 60 percent NO! vote. Why would anyone, let alone architects, worry about anything to do with any obligations, especially those of our Aboriginal people? If we seek to respect the First Nations experience, then we need to be a lot more rigorous, caring and responsive. Then perhaps we might be able to build for community and manage matters to sustain this approach to life and others rather than struggle for exotic dominance in our structures and social structures.

p.199-200

People fishing a family section of the great Brewarrina fish trap knew that they could take fish from the trap, but that they had to ensure it was done in such a way that it did not impede enjoyment or use of the amenity by fellow countrymen and countrywomen.


Brewarrina fish trap.


Brisbane suburb.

Imagine what our public places might be like if we considered every piece so that it added to rather than detracted from the pieces of their neighbours and the epic integrity of the land the city, town, village, and suburb . . . in such a way that it did not impede enjoyment or use of the amenity by fellow countrymen and countrywomen.



This is the recognition that we need to acknowledge and act upon.



#

As a minimum, appropriate wording for responding to a Welcome to Country would include: “I acknowledge the *___________________people, the Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander** Owners of the land where we gather today and pay my respects to Elders past, present and emerging. I recognise their connection to Country and their role in caring for and maintaining Country over thousands of years. May their strength and wisdom be with us today.”

*If known add the Traditional Owners’ clan/language group name

**Use ‘Aboriginal’ or ‘Torres Strait Islander’ as appropriate

https://indigenousportal.education.qld.gov.au/resource/Documents/acknowledgment-of-country-overview.pdf


No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.