Saturday, 18 July 2026

PAIRS 29 – CONNECTING TO THE LANDSCAPE


Two recently published projects both have texts that tell of their relationship with ‘the landscape’: see - https://www.dezeen.com/2026/07/15/daechi-ssangyong-studio-libeskind-seoul/ and https://share.google/zADUdSulmsYAgSrGb below. The Studio Libeskind cluster of six, 49 storied towers aims to connect residents with the landscape. The report later expands on this statement, seeming to want to explain this concept for a project located in Seoul’s dense Gangnam district, by including the sky in the broader understanding of connection: We wanted to design a place that connects residents to the sky, the landscape, and one another. The idea might appear admirable, but one does struggle to understand this achievement that suggests an appreciation of a broad, impressive, idyllic context, ‘the landscape,’ when the project seems to boldly highlight a bespoke separation in its declaration of an iconic, stand-alone setting that looks like a grand, self-contained theatrical performance area envisaged as a living work of art.


Fountainhead House.

Fountainhead House site.

Gangnam District, Seoul.

Studio Libeskind project, Seoul.

In contrast to this dense, high-rise concept of designed living, the report on the refurbishment of Wright’s Fountainhead House describes this home as A Frank Lloyd Wright-designed house rooted in the landscape . . . with its low horizontal profile, native materials, open-plan interiors, and close relationship with the surrounding landscape . . . glazed corners and terraces strengthen the connection to the surrounding landscape. The images reveal the house in a clearing in a leafy, naturally treed context. Here one can see and feel the snug fit with place, its quiet, contemplative peace, respecting nature itself, leaving one to question the intention behind the words connect and landscape used by a profession that can apparently accommodate such disparate outcomes.




When the words can be used to justify/explain designs in this way, does one assume that offices are just too easily carried away with the hype of their own promotional material, happy to adopt the shrewd ambiguity of suggestive spin rather than presenting the actual experience of place, which is, for Libeskind’s project, a dense, designed, high-rise living complex, with Wright’s home displaying the more natural, romantic notion of ‘landscape connection’ that involves a feeling for natural place. The photographs accompanying the Libeskind promotional article illustrate some green ‘landscaped’ areas around a group of towers, with more clusters of towers in the distance. The reference to ‘landscape’ in the text seems to be to the ‘landscaped’ areas around the towers, the gardens, rather than to ‘landscape’ in any natural setting of any scale that seems to be alluded to. One might hope that, as a matter of course, the designed green, ‘landscaped’ areas around the towers would indeed relate to the whole of which they are a part rather than being perceived as something of an exceptional, broader context – ‘the landscape.’




The desire to link with the landscape expressed in these texts reveals how the same words can be used to describe diverse experiences/intentions. There is little wonder that the public remains so sceptical of architects and their whims when their explanations seek to accommodate such differences without clarification, comment, or apology: the intimacy of a Wright house with its cosy closeness to nature, the ‘organic’ connection, with subtle acknowledgements to the visions/writings of Sullivan and Thoreau, remains suggested, lingering in the Libeskind concept that, at its best, can be seen to refer to that observational remoteness in the “WOW!” that arises between a person and place when landscape as distant vistas is viewed from a high lookout, admired for its being there as a postcard/calendar image rather than as an intimate, lived, everyday involvement, experienced in all of its quiet, subtle richness; but all we have here in Seoul are more towers and the ‘landscaped’ surrounds that pretty the site up. Libeskind may have all the very best intentions, creating ‘interesting’ fluid amazements at ground level, but it is truly puzzling to try to understand just how this massive scheme might connect to anything experientially enriching as ‘the landscape’ that is suggested in the idea of this connection, other than as a matter of fact: Curving gardens will weave between the residential towers and extend over the roof of the lounge space, which has views across the nearby Yangjae Stream.




The words end up tripping over themselves when one seeks to point out that ‘landscape’ is not ‘landscape,’ and ‘experience’ is not ‘experience,’ making things easier to be left alone as an evocative, unresolved, fuzzy notion of ‘landscape.’ Tower living isolates folk from both place and each other, with chance meetings in lifts and foyers, and ‘landscaped’ garden areas that limit the possibility of any casual connection to others. These landscaped surrounds become the introductory/retreat areas designed to fill in the gaps around the towers - the curving gardens that weave between the residential towers. Any connection to ‘the landscape,’ understood as natural or developed countryside, seems purely a matter of looking from an elevated position, admiring distance; and the connection to sky is similar, and just as remote. Even a passenger on a flight has no relationship with the sky as a lived experience other than being in it, like those dwelling in these 49 storeys.




The article that suggested that architectural offices might do more with their PR staff than promote themselves – see: https://voussoirs.blogspot.com/2026/07/can-architectural-firms-do-more-than.html, seems too idealistic, because it seems to be just about impossible to get offices to manage their promotional material reasonably, without the exaggerated, suggestive visions that get published. The dream of any ‘connection to the landscape’ might be happily understood as revealed in Wright’s work, but to harness this romantic, nostalgic link to explain/justify something starkly different seems misguided – wrong, a living work of art or not.






THE REPORTS

https://www.dezeen.com/2026/07/15/daechi-ssangyong-studio-libeskind-seoul/

Studio Libeskind designs cluster of Seoul skyscrapers as “a living work of art.”

Amy Peacock

Architecture firm Studio Libeskind has unveiled designs for six skyscrapers set to form a residential complex in Seoul’s Gangnam district.

Studio Libeskind collaborated with local architecture studios Samoo and HJ Design Partners on the design for the Daechi Ssangyong redevelopment project, which aims to connect residents with the landscape.

The development is set to be built in Gangnam's Daechi-dong neighbourhood by Samsung Engineering and Construction Group, replacing five existing buildings on the site that contain 630 housing units.

Rising to 49 storeys, Daechi Ssangyong will comprise nearly 1,000 residences across six skyscrapers.

Light-toned vertical facade elements will create patterns of curving bands on the exterior of the towers, designed to offer changing views as people and the sun move around the buildings.

"Our ambition was to create more than a collection of residential towers," said Studio Libeskind founder Daniel Libeskind.

"We wanted to design a place that connects residents to the sky, the landscape, and one another," he continued. "The architecture changes with light and movement, creating a living work of art that celebrates both the beauty of Seoul and the experience of everyday life."

Renders show a sinuous lounge space on the ground floor, with glazed walls that curve around a public square and a circular water feature.

Curving gardens will weave between the residential towers and extend over the roof of the lounge space, which has views across the nearby Yangjae Stream.

"In collaboration with Studio Libeskind, we will redefine the standard for luxury residential living through a distinctive exterior design that emphasises architectural asymmetrical forms and dynamic forms," said Cheol Jin Lim, head of residential sales at Samsung Engineering and Construction Group.

Construction on Daechi Ssangyong is expected to commence at the start of 2027, with the aim of completing in 2030.


https://share.google/zADUdSulmsYAgSrGb

Belinda Stewart Architects to restore Fountainhead

The Mississippi Museum of Art (MMA) selects Belinda Stewart Architects to lead the preservation and restoration of Fountainhead, the Frank Lloyd Wright-designed residence in Jackson, Mississippi, acquired by the museum in November 2025. The project marks the next phase in transforming Wright’s only building in Mississippi into a publicly accessible house museum and event venue, with an anticipated opening in 2028.

Based in Eupora, Mississippi, Belinda Stewart Architects specializes in the preservation and adaptive reuse of historic buildings. The firm will prepare a comprehensive Historic Structure Report, including condition assessments, Historic Building Information Modeling (HBIM), and a phased conservation strategy. The appointment also includes architectural services for structural repairs, landscape rehabilitation, accessibility upgrades, and code compliance, balancing public access with the preservation of the property’s historic character.

A Frank Lloyd Wright-designed house rooted in the landscape

Originally designed by Frank Lloyd Wright in 1948 for J. Willis and Edith Hughes, the house was completed in 1955, six years after the architect finalized the plans. The 331-square-meter residence exemplifies Wright’s Usonian principles through its low horizontal profile, native materials, open-plan interiors, and close relationship with the surrounding landscape.

Fountainhead is organized around a distinctive Y-shaped plan that follows the topography of a nearly 4,000-square-meter site. Its diamond-shaped modular geometry is expressed throughout the architecture, from the layout and built-in furnishings to the detailing of walls and ceilings. Large expanses of glazing connect interior spaces to the wooded landscape, while original features, including Wright-designed furniture, perforated wooden shutters, skylights, concrete floors, terraces, three fireplaces, the original copper roof, and a fountain flowing into a swimming pool, remain integral to the property.

The residence later underwent an extensive restoration by architect Robert Parker Adams, who purchased the residence in 1980 and maintained it for decades. Following Adams’ death in 2025, the Mississippi Museum of Art acquired the property, drawing inspiration from museums such as Crystal Bridges Museum of American Art, which similarly opened a Frank Lloyd Wright residence to the public. Investigative surveys and diagnostic testing are now underway as the preservation team begins documenting the building’s condition and developing a long-term restoration strategy before construction work proceeds.



No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.