The term, energy architecture, appears as a beacon in the lengthy text accompanying the image of a female robot# – see: https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202511/1347511.shtml (reproduced below). The report notes how the robot was so life-like,* that people needed proof that it was not merely a human figure dressed up to look like a robot. The concern seemed real given past occasions in which dogs have been painted up as pandas, and similar deceptions have occasionally been presented to the Chinese public - see: https://edition.cnn.com/2024/09/20/travel/guangdong-china-panda-dog-zoo-intl-hnk. Even when the manufacturers highlighted the features that ‘proved’ that there was no human inside, the sceptics remained anxious, with some saying that they needed further evidence that the figure was not teleoperated.
While one remains concerned about the pretence in presentations, one can note that our manipulation of language potentially holds much the same guise as the humanoid robot. There is something strange with these familiar words energy architecture that encase a unique and stark difference that is unsettling, all while remaining so convincing that one is happy to accept the dissembling invention even knowing that it is not what is seems to be.
The situation has everything in it that we now choose to describe as 'fake news.' Unfortunately, the deliberate ambiguity that correctly carries this label, can be used to muddle any perception just by the use of the term, with real, coherent experienced situations being falsely named in this way, throwing everything into a chaos of uncertainty. It is a circumstance that demeans true values and empowers the charlatan.
We might think such manipulation of meanings in our choice of words is clever, but its acceptance is deliberately confusing communications and perceptions, casting vague references that embellish with the smudged understandings and implications usually seen in ‘spin.’ So it is that we need and should insist on rigour in our messages, demanding a language that is not mangled by inferences; rather having one that hums with a clear, honest intention, not planning to manipulate discernment with loose speculations or random, fuzzy associations.
The more we mess with meanings, the less likely are we to truly understand anything or any one. Community relies on agreements; confusion only means disarray, a shattering of all gathering into a schism of unique individuals, each seeking and celebrating this special status. It is the making of singularity that turns us all into the equivalent of humanoid robots defining our own little worlds and interests with the concept that "I know what I mean" lying at the heart of this self-centred indulgence.
We see this situation in art, where a scribbled splash and a scraped scrawl are presented quietly but boldly with the implied claim of being deeply meaningful, leaving the viewer to offer an interpretation that the artist has never contemplated, with the artist cheekily arguing that the viewers have been left to make the interpretations, as if this hapless, hopeless guessing in a void might be a virtue.
The phrase energy architecture does likewise. With these games with language, we are turning the whole of revealed existence into the ambivalence of things fake, and are celebrating this as ‘progress’ - the future. We are left with an uncertainty guiding an indeterminate, and vice versa, and are told that this experience is embodies value. It is going to take a determined rigour and commitment to regain direction and integrity from this amorphous muddled mess - a disturbed disorder that flourishes as Modernity, and is enabled by social media, producing a confusing, dysfunctional disarray that ironically comes with the illusory promise of an ever-better future devoid of all humanity, or merely with some re-enactment of it, as if this might be desirable.
"Highly human-like AI robots have strong potential in the service industry," Ma Jihua, a veteran industry analyst, told the Global Times. "They can play key roles in elderly care, hospitality, and education, where natural human-robot interaction is essential."
#
One does ponder the question: why female? Why be so precisely feminine in every detail, so much so that there is something strangely sexual about the robot figure? Is this subtle inference meant to be a part of the allure of the amazement – a figure that is and is not naked; not even a real figure, but appearing as one?
THE REPORT
Automaker XPENG releases new video to prove its robot ‘IRON’ is not human
By Zhang Yiyi and Tao MingyangPublished: Nov 06, 2025 03:48 PM
XPENG showcases its new-generation humanoid robot "IRON" during the company's 2025 Tech Day on November 5, 2025. Photo: screenshot of Xpeng's video
Chinese
electric vehicle maker XPENG unveiled its new-generation humanoid
robot "IRON" at its 2025 Tech Day on Wednesday, captivating
audiences with its lifelike appearance and feline grace. The
unveiling quickly ignited heated debate among Chinese and
international netizens, prompting the company to release a video on
Thursday morning to prove there wasn't a person inside.
After
the robot's video was released on social media, foreign viewers on
YouTube marveled at its realism, with some commenting, "This
looks amazing. The way it all fits into that suit," and
"Definitely the most human-like gait out there." Some,
however, remained cautious, with one remarking, "I'll believe it
once reviews confirm it's not teleoperated — until then, I'm
skeptical." Similarly, Chinese netizens commented under XPENG
CEO He Xiaopeng's post on Douyin that the figure looked so lifelike
they could hardly believe it was a robot rather than a human.
To
dispel online speculation that the model was a real person, He
Xiaopeng released a video on Douyin explaining the details of the
robot's design, which was also shared with the Global Times on
Thursday morning. In the video, he said, "If you were there
yesterday among the more than 500 friends and media at the scene, you
wouldn't think it was a human. But through video alone, it's hard to
see clearly. For example, when standing beside it, you can hear the
cooling system and a bit of fan noise."
He then
invited the engineering team on stage, saying, "If you still
think there's a person inside, take a look at this hand. It's too
small for a human hand." The CEO went on to point out the
ear-like indentations on both sides of the head, explaining, "They're
actually microphones designed to function like human ears."
To
further prove his point, he even asked staff to unzip the back of the
robot on camera, revealing the internal mechanical structure beneath
the outfit.
Unlike most humanoid robots, XPENG's
new-generation IRON is designed to be "born from within."
It features a human-like spine, bionic muscles, and a fully flexible
skin that can be customized for different body types, according to a
statement the company sent to the Global Times.
With 82
degrees of freedom (DOFs) across the body, the robot moves naturally
and gracefully, capable of complex, catwalk-style motions. Its hands,
equipped with 22 DOFs, achieve true human-size proportions thanks to
the industry's smallest harmonic joints, the company said.
The
IRON also debuts the industry's first use of solid-state batteries,
offering exceptional lightness, high energy density, and enhanced
safety, according to the company.
XPENG told the Global
Times on Thursday that its new-generation humanoid robot IRON will
first be deployed in service-oriented scenarios such as reception,
shopping assistance, and patrolling.
Addressing one of the
industry's most debated questions - whether humanoid robots should
truly resemble humans - XPENG told the Global Times that its answer
is "to be as human-like as possible." The company believes
that achieving extreme human likeness is essential to tackling core
challenges in commercialization, generalization, and data
training.
A representative from XPENG told the
Global Times that aiming for a human-like form isn't just an
aesthetic choice — it's practical. "If you think about it,
real intelligence can't be scripted. It grows through AI learning,
and the richest data we have comes from human behavior itself,"
the representative said.
"Our homes, offices,
factories — everything is built for people. So when a robot moves
and behaves more like a person, it can slip into those spaces far
more naturally."
He added that user acceptance is
just as important as technology. "People have to like it and
trust it. A robot that feels familiar is easier to approach, easier
to work with — and that's how you get real adoption and
scale."
Compared with the first-generation model,
XPENG's new IRON has undergone a full upgrade in its bionic design,
intelligent system, and energy architecture, achieving a new level of
human-like appearance and interaction. Equipped with three Turing AI
chips delivering 2,250 TOPS of computing power, the robot debuts
XPENG's first large physical-world model that integrates VLT, VLA,
and VLM systems to enable advanced dialogue, motion, and interaction,
according to the company.
The VLT model, developed
specifically for robotics, serves as the core engine for autonomous
operation, enabling IRON to think, reason, and make independent
decisions, the company said.
"Highly human-like AI
robots have strong potential in the service industry," Ma Jihua,
a veteran industry analyst, told the Global Times. "They can
play key roles in elderly care, hospitality, and education, where
natural human-robot interaction is essential."
Ma
noted that achieving such realism demands powerful AI. "Robots
must not only look human but also think and move like
humans."
"XPENG's humanoid robot
demonstrates a level of dynamic coordination and embodied
intelligence well above the current industry average," Liu
Dingding, a veteran industry analyst, told the Global Times on
Thursday. "From motion continuity to posture control, its
stability and biomechanical fluidity closely resemble that of a
human, reflecting deep integration of perception, control, and
algorithmic modeling."
Ma added that automakers such
as XPENG and Xiaomi have unique advantages in developing humanoid
robots. "Building robots is much like making cars - both rely on
sensors, control systems, and intelligent algorithms. Level 4
autonomous vehicles are already advanced robots in essence, and the
next step could be something close to real-world
'Transformers.'"
Liu noted that China's breakthroughs
in embodied intelligence mark a rapid expansion of AI into the
physical world. "Whether in smart vehicles, industrial robotic
arms, or humanoid robots, the underlying systems share the same
foundation of AI algorithms and computing power. With continued
advances in visual perception, motion planning, and energy
management, different intelligent forms are increasingly achieving
cross-scenario synergy."
.jpg)

.jpg)
.jpg)

.jpg)

.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)

.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)

No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.