Friday 6 January 2023

AN UNFORTUNATE LOGO


The United Cup, the newly structured 2022 tennis tournament in Australia - the Australian Open warm up - has a clever graphic image. It is literally half a tennis ball cut along the profile lines that identify this furry sphere. It is a clever piece of geometry where two identical curved, cupped surfaces are mirrored and rotated ninety degrees so that they interlock to form the ball.








The graphic uses the lower half with the top removed, positioned so that one can read a capital 'U.' The concept is crisp and to the point: tennis and 'U' giving an identity to the United Cup tournament.


The trophy cup itself plays other twisting games not related to this theme, appearing somewhat flaming in form, and rather heroically Olympic.



Unfortunately there is another reading of this 'U' image logo that could be prompted by the equal role the female tennis players have in this sequence of games played between teams representing their countries: two male single games; two female single games; and one mixed doubles game.







The graphic is very similar in form to the absorbent sanitary pads made for females.

The curved 'U' form with swelling ends is clearly reminiscent of this item used for absorbent protection. This reading demeans the graphic, literally - re-means it. One wonders if one of the sanitary pad manufacturers might choose to be a sponsor, such is the strength of this other reading.






The problem with graphics is the unintended reference. Did the designers not realise this link? Sometimes one can become so engrossed in an idea that one is blinded to its inherent weaknesses.





The Australian Open graphic and it's sponsor's graphic, that of KIA, are two problematical graphics that suffer from other readings: see - https://voussoirs.blogspot.com/2020/01/fancy-graphics-a-is-not-v.html and https://voussoirs.blogspot.com/2021/02/graphic-games-kia-logo.html A good graphic should not require the effort to understand it's unique references; neither should it raise any alien innuendos. There should be an organic rigour about the identity, a happy certainty to the branding that does not require the dogged or stubborn effort of sticking to a weak graphic just to ensure that the reference is learnt by a determined, constant, stubborn reminding over time.


Australian Open Logo

Once seen as a sanitary pad, the United Cup image becomes somewhat farcical. It seems that we're going to have to learn to see this image otherwise - only as a ball in part: but alas, things are really never that straightforward; we will always be doomed to see both.



Kia Logo

The KIA graphic confirms this as one still sees it on centre court first as 'KN,' and then corrects it into all other variations before settling on an unlikely KIA as we are told to. In the same way, we have to force ourselves to read 'VO' as 'AO,' and forgive the designer.




Now 'U' for 'United' is seen as an unfortunate sanitary pad advert before its wanted reference, with low tennis camera angles providing images that all look like those in the ads that seek to prove the effectiveness of these absorbent items. This lingering reading is a problem for this graphic; it is not at all helpful.




NOTE:


Another associated tennis graphic is that for the Adelaide International, a tournament held in parallel with the United Cup games, prior to the Australian Open.







This graphic is an 'A' form with reversals suggesting tennis ball markings while reminding one of a torn, flattened Mobius strip; perhaps this has been a tennis ball that has been run over? The graphic is certain in its 'A' for Adelaide reference, but somewhat aimless in its identity of purpose beyond this.

It comes in white on black, and a coloured version too. The latter just adds to muddle the message which merely becomes more decoratively obscure.


A change in colours

P.S.



There is yet another logo that requires comment: that of the 'South Australia' brand. The logo appears behind the players at the Adelaide International with a large 'ADELAIDE'  above 'SOUTH AUSTRALIA,' confusing the message - is it city or state?




The logo form is made to look like a folded sheet of paper, creating the diagrammatical form of the land mass with Cape York added, but without Tasmania. Why? The SA state profile is cut out, and infilled with stepping forms that one is left guessing about: what; why; where is this leading? Is there a mining reference here: 'the pits'? It seems that this logo is more interested in the visual games of design intrigues rather than weaving any particular message beyond identifying the location of South Australia. The colouring of this logo is unhelpful in enriching it: the diagram is simply rendered differently. Why red, dark red, orange, and yellow? Desert colours? The graphic is best in black and white without any colouring games, for it appears that there really is no intellectual referencing here, merely, eye-catching, pretty shapes.






The pits?



There are many variations to this logo.


P.P.S.

Then there is the Adelaide Airport logo. One just hopes an aeroplane never loops like this! What is its meaning? One fears that this image is all about being cleverly smart, visually slick. It may be attractive, but a logo needs to be more rigorous than this loopy 'A'- or is it an 'a'?






19 Jan 2023

NOTE

There is another enigmatic logo that one glimpses behind the players in Adelaide - that of the WTA 250/500 (Women’s Tennis Association).



As a white on black image, one first reads the image as something like a pirate’s skull with deep hollow eyes; not a very good one, so one ponders more and realises that the marks reveal a tennis player and the arcing swing of the racquet.





It is an intriguing process of perception that requires an odd reversal in the reading of the silhouette fragments - with one part being a solid, real mass and form, and another a diagrammatic swoosh - both together in the same marking that makes no suggestion or indication of any substantial difference in referencing.



It is this ambiguity that weakens the graphic that strangely reads more easily in the colour purple.


Does the black and white first suggest and then reinforce the reading of the skull - the poor beginning of a Jolly Roger?





The idea is like the BBL (Big Bash League - cricket) promo that illustrates the blazing sweeps of the bat in full colour - the swoosh given form and colour, only in the ATP example, there is only form to define the sweep in the same way that the player has been indicated.









No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.