Wednesday, 2 March 2016

GREEN GOBBLEDYGOOK PROMOTES 'NEW KNOWLEDGE'?

The E-mail announced another 'green' lecture promoted by the AGDF – the Australian Green Development Forum. The Forum is active and shows an interest in matters green and architectural, so criticism of it does not relate to its efforts. The concern lies more with the broader aspects of CPD – Continuing Professional Development, its requirements and the rigour and professionalism displayed in their provision. The critique is that the promotional material is poorly expressed, the outcomes are naively identified as if for children - 'new knowledge,' and the required questioning involvement identified in the attached Worksheets, that suggests a 'schoolish' attitude to the whole experience, a 'pass/fail' examination to check on attention, rather than a professional overview/review/critique, making it all appear more like 'Compulsory' Professional Development – a 'You’ll get the cuts if its wrong!' attitude; maybe detention?: all of this when the ambition of CPD is to promote a stringent rigour in practice - 'to maintain competency in the practice of architecture (Section 16 of the Qld Architects Act) . . . maintenance, development and enhancement of . . . professional knowledge and skills.'

On wheelie bins:

see - http://voussoirs.blogspot.com.au/2016/02/catalysts-connections-and-interventions.html

The intent of CPD as identified by the Board of Architects of Queensland sounds sensible, almost reasonable. It is the implementation of this vision that causes one such concern. The latest ADGF promotion, GSLF – Lessons learned from 40 international cities audit for climate intervention – What can SEQ (Brisbane) do?, highlights some of the problematical issues. The promotional material is reproduced in full below. The information assembled by this Forum has been criticised previously – see: http://voussoirs.blogspot.com.au/2016/02/the-problems-of-gaining-knowledge.html This piece pointed out problems with hyphens. This deficiency continues in the current material: 'from micro to city wide policy directions' - but there is more that has to do with simple expression. The sentence is:

'BY understanding the buttons to push, there is opportunity for your projects to be more professional in its business cases and more sustainable as your work is recognised as resilient rather than a temporary consideration.'

Just what does this very unprofessional English mean? It is quite confusing. The initial 'BY' puzzles, as does the cliché phrase 'buttons to push;' but there is a raw irony in the claim that 'projects' can be more professional 'in its business cases.' Just what is meant by 'your work' being 'recognised as resilient rather than a temporary consideration'? This uncertainty hardly augurs well for an informative presentation meant to assist in the maintenance of 'competency in the practice of architecture.'

The hype continues:

'Donnell's presentation overviews culturally different approaches and successful innovations for better living with climate. Come and learn what works in other places, and could work for your projects too.'

What does 'better living with climate' mean? The 'Come and learn . . ' expression sounds like a sideshow spruiker, not a professional invitation.

Then, as if to clarify matters, we are advised of the 'Learning Outcomes.'

Participants shall:

Obtain new knowledge and able to understand 4 themes for addressing climate resilience in every city Enable customisation for local conditions Audit own projects with C40 framework (and updates). Learn creativity from low GDP countries Learn modelling & monitoring techniques from higher GDP countries Think differently beyond latest trinkets to address basic causes & impacts

The lack of any punctuation in this cryptic English makes this a confusing piece of text. It is almost as if the intent was to confuse sufficiently to make one believe that attendance was necessary in order to 'obtain new knowledge' that might help decipher the apparent mess. The outcomes continue to be scheduled in the same muddled form and format:

Share architectural experience and knowledge for 53 countries 6 subtropical design approaches Tropical adaptations that are useful for Queensland and Brisbane climate changes Amphibious architecture Kinetic Architecture Virtual Infrastructure Inclusive design
Contribute to a better understanding (improved) skills of Ethics in urban design - easy as 3,4,5.

What is '3,4,5'? - '1,2,3' but better?

Obtain new knowledge in relation to own professional ethics bio-mimicry interdisciplinary innovation

What is this 'professional ethics bio-mimicry interdisciplinary innovation '? It was Googled; immediately one was asked: 'Do you mean: biomimicry?' It seems that there is an extra hyphen here! These problems do very little to convince one there is a lot to learn here that could help 'maintain competency in the practice of architecture,' or be useful in the 'maintenance, development and enhancement of . . . professional knowledge and skills.' It seems that one might be able to help others promoting this lecture to 'gain new knowledge' and skills in expression. The concern has to do with how the text boasts of a promised improvement in what appears to read as gobbledygook:

Improved skills through a better understanding of options and opportunities to introduce new thinking to old problems integrate beyond incremental steps

What on earth is mean here? There is a sense that the use of complicated sets of flash words might add some prestige and in-depth meaning to the message. The presenter sounds impressive with his extensive list of qualifications, technical skills and practical expertise. So what is one to make of all of this confusing material when even his name is spelt wrongly in the promotional headlines, as 'Donnel Davis'?

The proposition is: why can CPD events not become truly professional promotions managed as if for professionals? That this $25 CPD event – is one tempted? - is so poorly presented is a concern, as it purports to be an 'educational' occasion, one that will help to 'maintain competency in the practice of architecture' when it seems obvious that there is a lack of competency in the presentation of the event. Does no one care about this seemingly illogical nonsense; this apparently irrational stance where one is being asked to attend to 'learn' in such an inept manner? Why on earth does one, a professional, have to 'sit the exam' as it were? Does the examiner get examined? The Worksheets are presented boldly and bluntly with five probing, testing questions and demands, and these are not multiple-choice: apparently all have to answered:

What are the 4 themes for addressing climate resilience in every city Enable customisation for local conditions Audit own projects with C40 framework (and updates)?

What are some subtropical design approaches Tropical adaptations that are useful for Queensland and Brisbane climate changes Amphibious Architecture Kinetic Architecture Virtual Infrastructure Inclusive design?

Give some examples of ethics in urban design.

What are some professional ethics bio-mimicry interdisciplinary innovation?

Give some examples of new thinking to old problems integrate beyond incremental steps.

CPD?

Who checks the answers to see if they are right? Has anyone looked at the questions to make sure that they are sensible, easily understood and grammatically correct? How is any of this charade meant 'to maintain competency in the practice of architecture (Section 16 of the Qld Architects Act)' or to have any role in the 'maintenance, development and enhancement of . . . professional knowledge and skills'? Perhaps this lecture is simply an AGDF fund-raising event?

The whole matter of CPD is close to being a farce. It needs to be sorted out if it is ever to gain respect and become useful for its purpose. If this was a product meant for a particular function, it would very likely be returned as being 'unfit for purpose.' Does The Australian Consumer Law apply here? Maybe it should, then we might be able to have a profession and a promoted CPD involvement of which one could be proud. Currently the CPD arrangements seem to look like a meaningless shambles. What do other professions think of architects? Isn't is the role of the Board to improve the standing of architects in the eye of the public? Is it failing? If the profession is to be a body that is respected and looked up to, it needs to do much better than to treat itself like this.

THE PROMOTION

GSLF March 9, 2016

Lessons learned from 40 international cities audit for climate interventions - what can SEQ ( Brisbane) do?

Donnel Davis - Founder of Envirobusiness

Overview:
As a result of learning from the audit findings of 40 cities that voluntarily participated, over 100 cities have adjusted their thinking and funding for future infrastructure and city priorities. Methodologies for those changes opens new ways to develop projects for change from micro to city wide policy directions. BY understanding the buttons to push, there is opportunity for your projects to be more professional in its business cases and more sustainable as your work is recognised as resilient rather than a temporary consideration.

Donnell's presentation overviews culturally different approaches and successful innovations for better living with climate. Come and learn what works in other places, and could work for your projects too.

Learning Outcome:
Participants shall:

Obtain new knowledge and able to understand 4 themes for addressing climate resilience in every city Enable customisation for local conditions Audit own projects with C40 framework (and updates). Learn creativity from low GDP countries Learn modelling & monitoring techniques from higher GDP countries Think differently beyond latest trinkets to address basic causes & impacts
Share architectural experience and knowledge for 53 countries 6 subtropical design approaches Tropical adaptations that are useful for Queensland and Brisbane climate changes Amphibious architecture Kinetic Architecture Virtual Infrastructure Inclusive design
Contribute to a better understanding (improved) skills of Ethics in urban design - easy as 3,4,5.
Obtain new knowledge in relation to own professional ethics bio-mimicry interdisciplinary innovation
Improved skills through a better understanding of options and opportunities to introduce new thinking to old problems integrate beyond incremental steps

Presentation and Interactive Workshop
Presenter: Donnell Davis - Founder Envirobusiness
Academic Qualifications: Doctorate: Sustainable City-Regions: Creating Responsive Institutions (Netherlands UNU & USQ Australia) Masters Environmental Management UQ (Sust Dev) Post Grad Public Policy QIT CPA (Audit & Program Evaluation) Bachelor Business DDIAE (Accounting/Finance & HRD) JP Queensland (1981)
Technical: 2014 Climate Reality Leadership Corp (International Program) 2012 Australian Mediators Association 2010 Innovation Scholarship (Australia) 2008 Commenced UN Law Uni, Netherlands “Sustainable City Regions: Creating Responsive Institutions” (completing USQ 2014 Doctorate of Professional Studies “Climate Sensitive Cities”) 2005 ASIC F146 accredited: Friendly Societies/Charities/Not for Profit/Cooperatives/Ethical Investment 2003 Program - Australian Institute of Company Directors 2001- International Accreditation as Executive Coach 1999- Masters Environmental Management (Sustainable Development) (UQ) 1993 Core subjects from Masters of Public Policy (QIT) resulting in Post Graduate Award 1992 Certificate - Counselling (Behavioural Science) UQ 1990 Certified Practising Accountant Program Deakin University - Distance Ed 1988 Bachelor of Business (Accounting and Finance) DDIAE external study 1987 Bachelor of Business (Management - HRM) DDIAE external study 1981 Justice of the Peace (Queensland) Languages – Fluent in English – minimal oral, written French, Spanish, commenced basic Mandarin, Katakana Japanese.

Practical Expertise: 25 Government 15 Year Private and third sectors Successful urban design projects: * Selsey House: sustainable affordable housing for older women - Runcorn Brisbane 2008 (Owner Builder Funder Manager Advocate) + Design for Disability (Future Self program) Swinburne partners +Sustainable Living Residents Package (FoSEQ) + Low carbon policy review (framework - systems for international reporting) Malaysia + Green cities review - Singapore +Commonwealth cities review - CHOGM + Retrofitting cities for climate resilience ( EAROPH) + Infrastructure evaluation - inclusive infrastructure investment guidelines +Microfinance for Pacific climate projects (2012-ongoing) empowering enterprise for addressing climate change +Greening Asia book 2 (EAROPH) DT x BM = RC

Please CLICK HERE to register your seat now!
Please CLICK HERE to download your worksheet for the March 9, 2016 event.

Competency Unit: DESIGN, DOCUMENTATION & PRACTICE MANANGEMENT

REGISTRATION

$25.00GET TICKETS

Overview:

As a result of learning from the audit findings of 40 cities that voluntarily participated, over 100 cities have adjusted their thinking and funding for future infrastructure and city priorities.

Methodologies for those changes opens new ways to develop projects for change from micro to city wide policy directions. BY understanding the buttons to push, there is opportunity for your projects to be more professional in its business cases and more sustainable as your work is recognised as resilient rather than a temporary consideration.

Donnell's presentation overviews culturally different approaches and successful innovations for better living with climate. Come and learn what works in other places, and could work for your projects too.

Learning Outcome:

Participants shall:

Obtain new knowledge and able to understand 4 themes for addressing climate resilience in every city Enable customisation for local conditions Audit own projects with C40 framework (and updates). Learn creativity from low GDP countries Learn modelling & monitoring techniques from higher GDP countries Think differently beyond latest trinkets to address basic causes & impacts
Share architectural experience and knowledge for 53 countries 6 subtropical design approaches Tropical adaptations that are useful for Queensland and Brisbane climate changes Amphibious architecture Kinetic Architecture Virtual Infrastructure Inclusive design
Contribute to a better understanding (improved) skills of Ethics in urban design - easy as 3,4,5.
Obtain new knowledge in relation to own professional ethics bio-mimicry interdisciplinary innovation
Improved skills through a better understanding of options and opportunities to introduce new thinking to old problems integrate beyond incremental steps

Presentation and Interactive Workshop
Presenter: Donnell Davis - Founder Envirobusiness
Academic Qualifications: Doctorate: Sustainable City-Regions: Creating Responsive Institutions (Netherlands UNU & USQ Australia) Masters Environmental Management UQ (Sust Dev) Post Grad Public Policy QIT CPA (Audit & Program Evaluation) Bachelor Business DDIAE (Accounting/Finance & HRD) JP Queensland (1981)
Technical: 2014 Climate Reality Leadership Corp (International Program) 2012 Australian Mediators Association 2010 Innovation Scholarship (Australia) 2008 Commenced UN Law Uni, Netherlands “Sustainable City Regions: Creating Responsive Institutions” (completing USQ 2014 Doctorate of Professional Studies “Climate Sensitive Cities”) 2005 ASIC F146 accredited: Friendly Societies/Charities/Not for Profit/Cooperatives/Ethical Investment 2003 Program - Australian Institute of Company Directors 2001- International Accreditation as Executive Coach 1999- Masters Environmental Management (Sustainable Development) (UQ) 1993 Core subjects from Masters of Public Policy (QIT) resulting in Post Graduate Award 1992 Certificate - Counselling (Behavioural Science) UQ 1990 Certified Practising Accountant Program Deakin University - Distance Ed 1988 Bachelor of Business (Accounting and Finance) DDIAE external study 1987 Bachelor of Business (Management - HRM) DDIAE external study 1981 Justice of the Peace (Queensland) Languages – Fluent in English – minimal oral, written French, Spanish, commenced basic Mandarin, Katakana Japanese.

Practical Expertise:

25 Government 15 Year Private and third sectors Successful urban design projects: * Selsey House: sustainable affordable housing for older women - Runcorn Brisbane 2008 (Owner Builder Funder Manager Advocate) + Design for Disability (Future Self program) Swinburne partners +Sustainable Living Residents Package (FoSEQ) + Low carbon policy review (framework - systems for international reporting) Malaysia + Green cities review - Singapore +Commonwealth cities review - CHOGM + Retrofitting cities for climate resilience ( EAROPH) + Infrastructure evaluation - inclusive infrastructure investment guidelines +Microfinance for Pacific climate projects (2012-ongoing) empowering enterprise for addressing climate change +Greening Asia book 2 (EAROPH) DT x BM = RC

Competency Unit: Design, Documentation & Practice Management

WHEN: Wednesday, 9 March 2016 from 12:30 PM to 1:30 PM (AEST) - Add to Calendar
WHERE: Theatrette Room - Brisbane Square Library. 266 George St. Brisbane CBD, QLD 4000 AU -View Map

WORKSHEET

GSLF March 9, 2016 CPD Workshop - Worksheet

What are the 4 themes for addressing climate resilience in every city Enable customisation for local conditions Audit own projects with C40 framework (and updates)?

Give some examples of ethics in urban design.

What are some professional ethics bio-mimicry interdisciplinary innovation?

Give some examples of new thinking to old problems integrate beyond incremental steps.

AND RESPECT

see: http://voussoirs.blogspot.com.au/2016/02/mottainai-architecture-reduce-reuse.html

Monday, 29 February 2016

MOTTAINAI ARCHITECTURE – REDUCE, REUSE, RECYCLE, & RESPECT

It was late in the day just before Sunday supermarket closing time, so it was easier for one to drop the other off for some last-minute grocery purchases - less pressure; not so much of a shared mad rush. During the car-park wait, the radio was switched on: maybe music? No: the interrupted discussion mentioned an odd word in a context that sounded interesting. It was jotted it down as a guessed reminder on the back of a small package as 'met tan ai' for future reference. The interviewer kept on sounding the word slightly differently, so the exact identification of the sounds was a little confusing. The discussion intrigued. The programme turned out to be The Philospohers Stone on ABC RN Radio, a 5:30pm Sunday programme on matters philosphically thoughtful. As the interview continued, my interest grew. I picked up the mobile phone and Googled my assumed spelling: it was corrected to 'mottainai.' The site explained the word as a Japanese notion, (so far so good), a concept that cautioned against waste. The book Grandma mottainai that had already been mentioned in the discussion was referenced in the listing, so it seemed that this was the correct word: see - http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/philosopherszone/avoiding-waste-with-the-japanese-concept-of-'mottainai'/6722720 Yes, this was indeed the term being used on the radio chat, as the subject matter of the talk did involve this issue that was identified as a moral stance with Buddhist links: Schumacher's Small is Beautiful came to mind.

The idea seemed useful, enlightening. At last there seemed to be something that one could identify, grasp, in order to better comprehend that elusive quality, that quiet power, the potency in things Japanese: see - http://voussoirs.blogspot.com.au/2013/05/shide-paper-power.html Traditional Japanese architecture has a quality about it that entrances and puzzles at the same time. It is enigmatic, whole, accessible, but elusive and aloof; physical but ephemeral; weighty but oddly light; present almost as a disbelief, incredible, enriched in a glow of ordinary, silent perfection. It touches on the world of the soul, whatever this means; but it does. Now we have a set of words that tell about the thoughts and attitudes of the makers, even if only tangentially: they offer something to hold on to and to reflect upon; to consider. One might struggle to identify matters that 'reduce, reuse and recycle' in any matter or manner of mystery, given the factual and fashionable emphasis and concentration on environmental issues today; but it is the final word 'respect' that resonates in the voids of complex, unfathomable meaning that appears to encompass things Japanese efficiently and effectively in one all-encompassing notion. One might paraphrase the set as: responsibility and respect. Boro, traditional Japanese mending, reduces, resues and recycles with great respect - see: http://voussoirs.blogspot.com.au/2012/08/boro-art-of-mending.html - but it is the sense of respect that embodies the responsibility shared in its 'reduce, reuse, and recycle' approach that it does so beautifully and with much care – with resounding regard and reverence.

In everything Japanese, it the art, the craft and the architecture, even in simple, everyday wrapping and packaging, it is respect that shapes the arena of action, defines its rigour, frames its ambitions; holds its intensity; embodies all of this with a defining clarity and determination. The concept has depth in its relevance. One senses respect as the core concept that embraces humility and commitment in attention, skill, thought and the manipulation of making that attends carefully to the detail of every thought, thing and act, caring for it in every way: acting knowingly, as the Buddhists speak of life and living. It is this central, core attitude that defines things traditionally Japanese even for us today. Respect is the essence, the essential feeling of form, its stringency.

What might we learn about this? Schumacher spoke of a Buddhist economics (Small is Beautiful 1973). Roots of Buddhist care exist in mottainai in the same way that Schumacher spoke of in his economics that saw, e.g., only silliness in biscuits made in Edinburgh being transported to London, while those made in London are passing on route to Edinburgh. This iconic example of irrational action sets the scene for most commercial activity today. The ideals of reducing, reusing and recycling, of a caring for all things, not merely quirky fashionable environmental matters that currently draw attention to themselves just too much, are rooted in respect. Issues spiritual, modest matters, are embodied in this concept, at its heart: Buddhism. So what might we do today? What can we do? What must we do?

Attempting to recreate an attitude that embodies these first three 'R's will never give anything but a re-enactment, an attempt to do something planned, practical and clever. A broader base of guidance and a different intent is needed. Respect has at its core a certain, ordinary, caring richness: an essential rigour; a necessity beyond preconceived enactment: a quality of depth and coherence. There is something central, core, in respect that has an emotional essence beyond the facts of being able to reduce, recycle and reuse. One has to feel honestly and be committed to the action. In the fever for 'environmental' achievement, these terms have almost become clichés today. What is lacking in most circumstances is a commitment to respect. Too much attention is now given over to the promotion of ME and MY bespoke self that is catered for in 'tourism' – see: http://springbrooklocale.blogspot.com.au/2012/06/who-or-what-is-tourist.html It is an attitude facilitated, indeed, promoted, by social media – selfies; talk about ME and MY feelings becomes the heart of all actions that seek the attention of others with an effort to reveal something unique in ME – the one-and-only in the universe. Respect removes this focus elsewhere; realigns it into something more inclusive, more wholesome: mankind; life. We need to know this and enact it in living if we want to reach beyond ourselves, our concerns, and our efforts. It is too easy to just 'reduce, recycle and reuse;' it is simplistically naive, indulgent, to let such activities become self-praiseworthy: 'Look at how good, how responsible I am!'

Respect reaches out to touch and understand; to care beyond self-interest. It is a remarkably inclusive term that embodies a core attitude that can be applied to everything. 'To respect' encompasses an understanding, a recognition of others; it entertains a position that is constantly considering others; it displays a caring interest in and a concern for all - people and things -with humility and understanding. It is a notion that our world knows little of in these days of social media hype that exclaims the glory of ME and MINE in a chaos of self-interested effort that demands recognition of MY display; the bespoke ME claiming and demanding my rights to be uniquely different.

Respect is an action; an emotional participation that can only be pure and singular, unpolluted, in its application, or else it is otherwise, something else. The more it is considered, the more remarkable the term is; and the more essential it can be seen to be if our world is to cohere and blossom with a gentle, fertile energy. It is a term that is spoken of as 'earning' as well as 'giving.' It is reciprocal in its effort. Personal responsibility is embodied in a tangible manner. One can 'earn' respect in managing one's mode of action, just as one can 'give' respect to others.

Is it that the giving of respect earns respect; and vice versa? Consider the experience of traditional Japanese architecture, the rock garden. Does the doing involve and embody the emotion itself to be experienced by others in the object? Art/architecture theory likes to avoid this notion of personal feeling that places a relevance on the emotional state of the maker, the doer, in order to promote more 'intellectual' positions in more abstract, schematic notions of feeling in theory that is really only ever the interaction of flesh and blood: living emotion. Things personal are discarded as being tainted, irrational. If this interaction is possible - that the feeling of the maker can be embodied in form of the thing - then we must act now and start respecting ourselves, others, our works, others' works, our world: life; then we might begin to understand more than another's declared brilliance that is frequently promoted as genius; 'star' quality: see - http://voussoirs.blogspot.com.au/2016/02/bespoke-brilliance-trials-of-quirky.html and http://www.architectureanddesign.com.au/news/2016-bond-university-architecture-lecture-series-t Star lineup revealed for first of Bond Uni's architecture lecture series - (is it not 'line-up'?)

The concept of respect alone tells us this. It makes a total commitment to being. In our world that seems to dislike and avoid anything that gets close to personal emotions or religious feeling, respect might be able to realign our attitudes and approaches and help us manage matters ephemeral and elusive, those very matters experienced in things traditionally Japanese – indeed, in most traditional art where the thoughts and feelings, attitudes of the doer were critical to outcomes. It could be a way to consider these fragile, subtle things without destroying them. Today, we prefer to argue that such qualities lie embodied in the work itself as rational, 'aesthetic' qualities to be analysed and experienced by others.

The irony is that in order to even try to properly, sensitively understand matters ephemeral in traditional things, one has to respect them, their makers, their contexts and their beliefs, not drag these things into our world of 'aesthetic' observation with intellectually argued explanations and analysis. Ananda Coomaraswamy has told us this - (Why Exhibit Works of Art?) Architecture needs to re-evaluate matters spiritual and personal. One might highlight the circumstance being referred to by illustrating a Gehry work and a traditional piece, and consider the difference, and ask why; why 'ME' in one and something more inclusive; richer, more whole in the other? It is something that needs to be pondered, with respect.

One hopes that the notion of mottainai becomes more than a flash fad; more than one of the flimsy, passing fashions that our era so keenly promote with perpetually transient enthusiasm; ideas to be discarded for the 'ever-new' boast that declares MY bespoke tastes that carry the latent statement: 'It is your problem if you cannot undertsand what I am saying!' - see: http://voussoirs.blogspot.com.au/2016/01/is-todays-architecture-hoax_16.html Sadly boro seems to have assumed this role in our era to become just clever patchwork. There is something moral here that needs attention. One can already sense the cringe; the innate protest that kills the very thing being sought - an understanding of respect: its importance and its relevance in life and architecture.

The challenge is that one has to start this journey with respect: one has to change before one can be changed. It seems to be the same irrational stance that the mind reveals in all religious faiths that speak of believing first, before one can understand. Buddhism suggests a more practical start: to know that you are walking, living; but even this requires a personal change - a moral stance.

Can we do it? Do we care? We have to!

NOTE

1 March 2016

Perhaps husbandry is another way to understand these sensitive issues: see -

http://voussoirs.blogspot.com.au/2016/02/the-rational-shaping-of-surfaces-town.html

Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

ON GARDENING

I am strongly of the opinion that the possession of a quantity of plants, however good the plants may be themselves and however ample their number, does not make a garden; it only makes a collection. Having got the plants, the great thing is to use them with careful selection and definite intention. Merely having them, or having them planted unassorted in garden spaces, is only like having a box of paints from the best colourman, or, to go one step further, it is like having portions of these paints set out upon a palette. This does not constitute a picture; and it seems to me that the duty we owe our gardens and to our own bettering in our gardens is so to use plants that they shall form beautiful pictures; that, while delighting our eyes, they should be always training those eyes to a more exulted criticism; to a state of mind and artistic conscience that will not tolerate bad or careless combination or any sort of misuse of plants, but in which it becomes a point of honour to be always striving for the best. Gertrude Jekyll Colour in the Flower Garden Mitchell Beazley London 1998 – Introduction (first published 1908)

MORE IS LESS

Significantly, in the era of the ‘information revolution’, the same process is now affecting disinformation: whereas in the past it was lack of information and censorship which characterized the denial of democracy by the totalitarian state, the opposite is now the case. Disinformation is achieved by flooding TV viewers with information, with apparently contradictory data. The truth of the facts is censured by over-information, as we have seen from the press and television discussing the Balkans. The globalitarian state, built out of economic-strategic alliances, is no longer old ‘Anastasia’ with her scissors: it is Babel. Now more is less. And in some cases, less than nothing. Deliberate manipulation and unintentional accidents have become indistinguishable.

Paul Virilio Strategy of Deception Verso 2007 p.48

(first published Editions Galilee 1999)

‘That which precedes the event is not necessarily its cause,’ claims the wisdom of the ancients. p.76

As Negroponte has rightly remarked, with the ‘liberation of information’ on the Web, what is most lacking is meaning or, in other words, a context into which Internet users could put the facts and hence distinguish truth from falsehood. On the Web, where, as everyone knows, the terrorist temptation is constant and where depredations of hackers are committed with impunity in a strange state of legal indeterminacy, the difference between (true) information and (false) deception fades a little more each day. In entering the looking-glass worlds of television and home computers, we are in the end left in the position of Kinglake’s old ‘English soldiery’. As they saw it,

insofar as the battlefield presented itself to the bare eyesight of men, it had no entirety, no length, no breadth, no size, no shape and was made up of nothing . . . In such conditions, each separate gathering . . . went on fighting its own little battle in happy and advantageous ignorance of the general state of the action; nay, even very often in ignorance of the fact that any great conflict was raging.

As Albert Camus asserted: ‘When we are all guilty, that will be true democracy.’ p.78

ENCOUNTERING CONRAD

Ryszard Kapuściński The Other Verso London 2018, p. 92

At the end of his book, Kapuściński asks whether, in our encounters with others in the future:

Will we jointly wish to refer to what – as Conrad puts it - ‘speaks to our capacity for delight and wonder, to the sense of mystery surrounding our lives; to our sense of pity, and beauty, and pain; to the latent feeling of fellowship with all creation – and to the subtle but invincible conviction of solidarity that knits together the loneliness of innumerable hearts: to the solidarity of dreams, in joy, in sorrow, in aspirations, in illusions, in hope, in fear, which binds men to each other, which binds together all humanity – the dead to the living and the living to the unborn.’?*

* J. Conrad, Preface to The Nigger of the ‘Narcissus’: A Tale of the Sea, New York: W.W.Norton, 1979.

Architecture stands in between of all of these circumstances of encounter, but how does it explain itself beyond being a bespoke ‘grand design’ of a potential genius?

ON THE CULTURE OF OTHERS

Herodotus . . . wanted to know them because he understood that to know ourselves we have to know Others, who act as a mirror in which we see ourselves reflected; he knew that to understand ourselves better we have to understand Others, to compare ourselves with them, to measure ourselves against them. As a citizen of the world, he did not believe that we should isolate ourselves from Others, or slam the gates in their faces. Xenophobia, Herodotus implied, is a sickness of people who are scared, suffering an inferiority complex, terrified by the prospect of seeing themselves in the mirror of the culture of Others.

Ryszard Kapuściński The Other Verso London 2018, p. 19

CLEVER PEOPLE SELF-DOUBT

I last met him when Philomena came out back in 2013. Back then, Coogan was a bracing, combative interviewee. He saw every question as a potential ambush and moved to thwart any perceived journalistic angle. Today, though, he seems more comfortable with the process, more at ease with himself. It used to be that he felt he always had to have his guard up. Now he accepts that he can sometimes afford to let it drop. He’s middle aged and a mass of insecurity and contradictions. He suspects that, on balance, that’s not such a terrible thing to be.

“And actually I think acknowledging your own fallibility makes you a better artist and a better person,” he says in a rush. “It’s fairly obvious to me that the real wisdom lies in seeing people’s failings and trying to understand them. Because the alternative is that very childlike, Donald Trump thing of believing that admitting any weakness is fatal. What was it Bukowski said? All the clever people are full of self-doubt and all the stupid people are very confident. That’s the era we’re living in now. That’s the era I don’t want to be a part of. So all you can do is try to go about things differently. Do interesting work and don’t be a cunt.”

Coogan gulps for breath. His eyes widen and then he rocks with laughter. “There you go, that’s my big artistic statement,” he says. “Do interesting work and don’t be a cunt. Took me the best part of an hour. Got there in the end.”

https://www.theguardian.com/film/2019/jan/04/steve-coogan-interview-stan-and-ollie

HILLS

The hills bespeak a healing power and closeness to unseen help now lost in the security of modern welfare. Those who befriend the silent peaks in a lifetime's work know well their embracing strength. (p.91)

For only once is it given to man to lie in the arms of the eternal forces which give all matter form. (p.98)

Iain R Thomson Isolation Shepherd Birlinn, Edinburgh, 2007

I will lift up mine eyes unto the hills, from whence cometh my help.

My help cometh from the Lord, which made heaven and earth.

Psalm 121 King James Version (KJV)

SPAN

17 August 2012

This blog began as a co-operative concept. While the idea and the stimulus was generated through discussion, the blog has turned out to be an individual enterprise. SPAN stands for ‘Spence and’ in the context of others. As a word, it fitted in nicely with the idea of voussoirs - parts and pieces, complete with keystones, that could ‘span’ the gaps in understanding and communication. The word SPAN also allowed for a shared input into a blog.

Spence Jamieson is an architect and the author of these articles. The blogs show the scope of his interests.

THE IDEA

chapters and verses as architectural commentary:

the wedge to isolate, array and shape ideas; the keystone to highlight core, supporting issues. voussoirs is a concept to start an architectural discussion to span the large gap in the debate on things architectural; a bridging of the void in architectural issues by exploring considered bits and pieces. The state of the profession today is highlighted by silence and self. It is introvert and protective. Educational centres remain isolated within their own constructs, being run primarily as businesses. They put very little back into the community. They indulge themselves in their own interests and exclude contrary and different ideas and ideals. They constantly avoid any challenge on concepts or strategies that might change the plotted course. Rarely does comment ever come from this academic world into the public or any arena. Very few publications help direct the public interest. Rarely do newspapers grasp the issues and explore them. One aspect may be given space in the popular press, but architectural debates and concerns are rarely given attention. The professional institutes are doing much the same as the educational institutions. Private practice is doing likewise, offering, if anything, only its own pushy propaganda to the public. Yet there is a discussion and debate in these silences that needs a larger and more open platform. Discussion is alive and well amongst a few in at least one curry house, but the debate needs to be a broadened. voussoirs is the place for this discussion. It is a site for ideas, comment, articles, and critiques on things architectural and associated issues. It is here that matters can be aired and ideas discussed and debated without fear of the neglect and disdain that institutions and private groups and publishers give to open speaking and differing ideas.

There can be no true understanding of any idea if discussion and debate are curtailed in favour of a preferred position.

ON COMMUNICATION

. . . there has been a growing feeling of concern to solve what is now commonly called “the problem of communication.” But if one observes efforts to solve this problem, he will notice that different groups who are trying to do this are not actually able to listen to each other. As a result, the very attempt to improve communication leads frequently to yet more confusion, and the consequent sense of frustration inclines people ever further toward aggression and violence, rather than toward mutual understanding and trust.

David Bohm On Dialogue Routledge, Oxon, 1996 (2004) p.2

ON ART & METHOD

Even in relationships with inanimate objects and with nature in general, something very like communication is involved. Consider, for example, the work of an artist. Can it be properly said that the artist is expressing himself, i.e., literally “pushing outward” something that is already formed inside him? Such a description is not in fact generally accurate or adequate. Rather, what usually happens is that the first thing the artist does is only similar in certain ways to what he may have in mind. As in a conversation between two people, he sees the similarity and the difference, and from this perception something further emerges in his next action. Thus, something new is continually created that is common to the artist and the material on which he is working.

David Bohm On Dialogue Routledge, Oxon, 1996 (2004) p.4

THE NECESSITY OF THE INCOMPLETE

The early 50's and 60's is a period that is gaining interest in architectural ideas. Perhaps this is why Princeton chose to republish The Tao of Architecture. It is a beautiful little book that discusses the implications of traditional wisdom in architecture. Given the astonishing lack of direction in current architectural theory, the publication is very timely.

Amos Ih Tiao Chang, The Tao of Architecture, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1956, reprinted 2017.

p.26

Laotzu's idea of formation is heavily concerned with emptiness or non-existence. To him who regards nothing as persistent, what is essentially important in things is the possibility of becoming something, not the opportunity of remaining as something confronting deterioration. Consequently, meaningful incompletion is taken as the most desirable state of tangible being.

p.22

. . . the full meaning of existence is beyond the power of any manifestation. What appears tangible, architectural or natural, is only a means to suggest that which is lacking in appearance and existing in man's intangible understanding and aesthetic feeling.

LIVING IN IMPERMANENCE

Maybe it is a good thing for us to keep a few dreams of a house that we shall live in later, always later, so much later, in fact, that we shall not have time to achieve it. For a house that was final, one that stood in symmetrical relation to the house we were born in, would lead to thoughts – serious, sad thoughts – and not to dreams. It is better to live in a state of impermanence than in one of finality.

Gaston Bachelard The Poetics of Space

see: THE NECESSITY OF THE INCOMPLETE in the sidebar

THE REAL AND THE IMAGINARY

I prefer, by far, real islands to imaginary islands, just as I prefer prime documents to novelistic remakes. That's because the real is richer than the imagination. The real demands investigation and is an invitation to sensitive knowledge, whereas the imaginary is more often than not just a collection of stereotypes, a soup of clichés offering an infantile kind of satisfaction. Then, a relationship to the real and its resistance requires changes in thought, in ways of being, in ways of saying, it leads to a transformation of the self. Whereas imagination is nothing but compensation. There's even something horribly autistic about sitting in one spot and spinning out invention by the yard. How much more interesting an open and poetic process involving contemplation, study, movement, meditation and composition.

Kenneth White Across The Territories Travels from Orkney to Rangiroa Polygon Edinburgh 2004 p.86

VISION, CIVILIZATION & SPIRIT

The architect who combines in his being the powers of vision, of imagination, of intellect, of sympathy with human need and the power to interpret them in a language vernacular and time - - - is he who shall create poems in stone.

When you look on one of your contemporary 'good copies' of historical remains, ask yourself the question: Not what style, but what civilization is this building? And the absurdity, vulgarity, anachronism and solecism of the modern structure will be revealed to you in a most startling fashion.

It cannot for a moment be doubted that an art work to be alive, to awaken us to life, to inspire us sooner or later with its purpose, must indeed be animate with a soul, must have been breathed upon by the spirit and must breathe in turn that spirit.

Louis Sullivan

AN UNCHANGING PROFESSION

ARCHITECTURAL PRACTICE

. . . no one can relieve (the architect) from the need to rely on his own discretion, for that discretion is linked to a responsibility which belongs to no one but (the architect). It is the exercise of discretion hampered by considerations of cost, of risk, of exact justice, of conflicting interests, of uncertainty as to facts, of misunderstandings and of diverse individualities and dishonest or incapable agents, which is the chief care and preoccupation of architectural practice. To design a building, to draw and specify every part of it, and to direct its construction and see it completed with no other anxieties and dilemmas than belong to the exercise of those duties, is unknown.

H.B.Creswell The Honeywood Settlement Faber and Faber Limited London 1967 (fourth edition: first edition 1930 Architectural Press) p.128

MENDING WALL

Something there is that doesn't love a wall,
That sends the frozen-ground-swell under it,
And spills the upper boulders in the sun,
And makes gaps even two can pass abreast.
The work of hunters is another thing:
I have come after them and made repair
Where they have left not one stone on a stone,
But they would have the rabbit out of hiding,
To please the yelping dogs. The gaps I mean,
No one has seen them made or heard them made,
But at spring mending-time we find them there.
I let my neighbor know beyond the hill;
And on a day we meet to walk the line
And set the wall between us once again.
We keep the wall between us as we go.
To each the boulders that have fallen to each.
And some are loaves and some so nearly balls
We have to use a spell to make them balance:
'Stay where you are until our backs are turned!'
We wear our fingers rough with handling them.
Oh, just another kind of out-door game,
One on a side. It comes to little more:
There where it is we do not need the wall:
He is all pine and I am apple orchard.
My apple trees will never get across
And eat the cones under his pines, I tell him.
He only says, 'Good fences make good neighbors'.
Spring is the mischief in me, and I wonder
If I could put a notion in his head:
'Why do they make good neighbors? Isn't it
Where there are cows?
But here there are no cows.
Before I built a wall I'd ask to know
What I was walling in or walling out,
And to whom I was like to give offence.
Something there is that doesn't love a wall,
That wants it down.' I could say 'Elves' to him,
But it's not elves exactly, and I'd rather
He said it for himself. I see him there
Bringing a stone grasped firmly by the top
In each hand, like an old-stone savage armed.
He moves in darkness as it seems to me~
Not of woods only and the shade of trees.
He will not go behind his father's saying,
And he likes having thought of it so well
He says again, "Good fences make good neighbors."

Robert Frost

CATHEDRALS and SYMBOLISM

Everything is the symbolical representation of an idea. p.28

The same artists, who had to follow a strict rule when treating the history of God, could use all of their imagination when treating the ornamental: whence the blossoming of the grotesque and the original. p.38

In those days religion, drama, and art had the same aim and sought to provoke the same thoughts. They did not pretend to amuse the people; they endeavoured to teach them. p.51

This way of thinking and reasoning takes sometimes a very subtle turn. p.53

Hélène Fouré The French Cathedrals Their Symbolic Significance Bruce Humphries Inc. Publishers, Boston, 1931

THE COMPLIMENT & THE CRITIC 2

ON DEMOLISHING BUILDINGS

Nothing appears to me much more wonderful, than the remorseless way in which the educated ignorance, even of the present day, will sweep away an ancient monument, if its preservation be not absolutely consistent with immediate convenience or economy. Putting aside all antiquarian considerations, and all artistical ones, I wish that people would only consider the steps, and the weight of the following very simple argument. You allow that it is wrong to waste time, that is, your own time; but then it must be still more wrong to waste other people’s; for you have some right to your own time, but none to their’s. Well, then, if it is thus wrong to waste the time of the living, it must be still more wrong to waste the time of the dead; for the living can redeem their time, the dead cannot. But you waste the best of the time of the dead when you destroy the works they have left you; for those works they gave the best of their time, intending them for immortality.

John Ruskin Lectures on Architecture George Routledge & Sons Limited, London p.109

THE COMPLIMENT & THE CRITIC 1

How to avoid insult

But how much of nature have you in your Greek buildings? I will show you, taking for an example the best you have lately built; and, in doing so, I trust that nothing that I say will be thought to have any personal purpose, and that the architect of the building in question will forgive me; for it is just because it is a good example of the style that I think it more fair to use it for an example. If the building were a bad one of the kind, it would not be a fair instance; and I hope, therefore, that in speaking of the institution on the mound, just in progress, I shall be understood as meaning rather a compliment to its architect than otherwise. It is not his fault that we force him to build in the Greek manner.

John Ruskin Lectures on Architecture and Painting George Routledge & Sons Limited; New York: F.P.Dutton & CO - p.64-65

ON EDUCATION

'. . those who are responsible for giving instruction in the theory of architecture should be practising architects. The warning is necessary because, strange though it may seem, English schools of architecture to-day tend to be run by men who either do not practise at all, or whose practices are for them a very subsidiary spare-time occupation. Often a teaching appointment is a means by which a clever student avoids the humiliation of entering an office as a junior assistant, thus depriving himself of the only opportunity he will ever have of learning something of the practical side of his profession from the bottom upwards. There can be no doubt whatever that the teaching of theory has suffered severely as a result of this habit: and this leads me to the conclusion that no man should be permitted to teach until he is recognized by his Faculty as a Master of Theory and Practice. In other words, he should be not only a practising architect but also, what is unfortunately a much rarer specimen, a good architect.'

W.A. Eden, The Process of Architectural Tradition, Macmillian & Co. Ltd, London, 1942, p.p. 86-87

ETHICS

Thus Pugin laid the foundation stones of that strange system which dominates the nineteenth-century art criticism and is immortalised in the Seven Lamps of Architecture: the value of a building depends on the moral worth of its creator; and a building has a moral value independent of, and more important than, its esthetic value. We must not consider this emphasis on morality peculiarly Victorian. Whenever esthetic standards are lost, ethical standards rush in to fill the vacuum; for the interest in esthetics dwindles and vanishes, but the interest in ethics is eternal.

Kenneth Clark The Gothic Revival - An Essay in the History of Taste, (1^st edition Constable 1928); third edition John Murray 1962, reprinted 1974, p.149.

MODERNITY

The everyday is covered by a surface: that of modernity. News stories and the turbulent affectations of art, fashion, and event veil without ever eradicating the everyday blahs. Images, the cinema and television divert the everyday by at times offering up to its own spectacle, or sometimes the spectacle of the distinctly noneveryday; violence, death, catastrophe, the lives of kings and stars – those who we are led to believe defy everydayness. Modernity and everydayness constitute a deep structure that a critical analysis can work to uncover.

Henri Lefebvre, The Everyday and Everydayness, in Stephen Harris and Deborah Berke, Architecture of the Everyday, Princeton Architectural Press, New York, 1997, p.37.

NAMING

The simplest act of substitution is to put the name of a maker in the place of his or her work, which amounts to a paraphrase in itself. . . . All paraphrase sets aside the original: To put the name in place of the painting is to remove it from immediate consciousness; to narrate the life of an individual is an act profoundly different from looking into a painting and one that cannot be conducted simultaneously with it. To substitute a temporal narrative, already present in a name, for the physical work of art is to give up those features of the thing that were transient and unrepeatable, bound to a moment that is irrevocably ended; the unique insistence is, for the moment at least, sacrificed on the altar of continuity.

Thomas Crow, The Intelligence of Art, The University of North Carolina Press, 1999, p.1.

ON BRANDING

Branding is now the art of getting people to think what something might be rather than what it necessarily is. It's about the manipulation of the virtual reality in which so many live. The manipulators include anyone with an interest in what we might think of them - not just big companies with products to sell but political parties with votes to win, design gurus with clients to attract - anyone, in other words, acting in some kind of market. They all have an interest in controlling their appearance to make us believe it is the reality.

John Humphrys Beyond Words How Language Reveals The Way We Live Now Hodder and Stoughton. Great Britain 2006, p. 86-87

see:

http://voussoirs.blogspot.com.au/2015/10/faking-provenance-misuse-of-meaning.html

PRECONCEPTION

Leone Huntsman Sand in Our Souls The Beach in Australian History Melbourne University Press 2001, p.16:

Thus first impressions were filtered through existing preconceptions, starkly revealed in Sir Joseph Banks's description of the people seen from Captain James Cook's Endeavour when it first touched on the Australian continent in 1770:

In the morn we . . . [discerned] 5 people who appeared through our glasses to be enormously black: so far did the prejudices which we had built on Dampier's account influence us that we fancied we could see their Colour when we could scarce distinguish whether or not they were men.

Here Banks refers to William Dampier's unfavourable accounts of the West Australian aboriginal people in published accounts of his landings in 1688 and 1699, and reveals his own awareness of the extent to which perception was influenced by expectation.

see: http://voussoirs.blogspot.com.au/2014/04/seeing-what-we-believe-idyllic-visions.html

THE MUSE - GETTING IT RIGHT

"It can be in the morning, any old time, I wake up with an idea and it starts following you around.

"You go, 'Ah that's good' because you know when it's going to work, it's going to be fruitful.

"Other times you'll get the edge of an idea and maybe it fades away or there's just no way it can be made to serve, you know?

"Then you just, it takes its time and you work on it and if necessary you work on it more than once. I'm known to work on it two or three times before you get it right."

Les Murray

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-10-02/les-murray-latest-volume-reflects-on-bunyah/6816714

http://www.lesmurray.org/

JARGON

The world seems to find it necessary to use more and more jargon in general reporting and conversation. It is especially noticed in accounts and discussions on the arts. The ABC TV arts programme presented on 7 January 2017 at 6:15pm had more jargon than usual; indeed, had more unusual expressions than previously encountered, ones that had not been heard before:

"unpicking the tapestry" of one's life;

and

looking at "the fan deck of what you do."

These reminded one of other popular fashionable expressions:

“to unpack an issue,” meaning to analyse it in some detail;

and

“to segue,” meaning to shift to a new topic or activity.

This last term is a favourite of radio announcers. The Italian word is often misspelt as ‘segway’ because of the similar phonetic sounding that is more commonly understood as Segway, the brand of a human transporter.

The parallel is interesting, as the idea of being ‘transported’ is common to both words, but it seems to hold little interest to the radio voices that appear just too cleverly happy with the use of this different, interesting expression.