Today’s news carried reports on four new projects:
https://www.dezeen.com/2022/05/14/filipe-pina-david-bilo-casa-namora-farmhouse-portugal/
https://www.dezeen.com/2022/04/19/ripponlea-house-extension-interiors-luke-fry/
and
https://www.designboom.com/architecture/denizen-works-mannal-house-tiree-scotland-05-13-2022/.
'The truly remarkable home built to float above water'
Yet again we see a minimalist, piecemeal presentation of buildings that offer very little information other than some sundry, arty images: see - https://voussoirs.blogspot.com/2022/04/architectural-jigsaws.html and https://voussoirs.blogspot.com/2022/04/more-jigging-sawing.html. The idea of publishing plans and sections of projects, let alone revealing informative photographs, seems to be a thing of the past. Today, it seems, the most important matter is ‘expression’ – see note at end of https://voussoirs.blogspot.com/2022/05/is-breaking-rules-clever.html. These projects offer very little other than pretty, promotional images that seek to impress with an artful identity and the hype of words. Why else might one publish an image of a curtain or a corner of a bathroom?
'Luke Fry squeezes extension behind bungalow in Melbourne'
The situation has become serious, as it seems to be learning from social media where images are continually posted just for others to instantly ‘like’ or ‘dislike’ before flicking on thoughtlessly to more of the same; to more images to drool over with instant envy, or to try to match in quick style. Architecture seems to be becoming a shallow matter of selected appearances rather than involving itself in any rigour of theory, social thought, or belief.*
The concern is that this ‘social media’ approach will become the designer’s intent, with forms being created just for ‘interesting’ photographs. The idea that architecture might be about life itself, as Christopher Alexander noted; and that it might involve a coherent inner beauty rather than any impressive random parts, appears to be forgotten.
' A DWELLING ATOP THE SCOTTISH COASTLINE'
One could argue that architecture has allowed itself to be swept away in the enthusiasm for instant indulgence rather than involve itself in serious life matters, preferring the ‘arty’ approach rather than any internal or procedural rigour. One can only refer architects to Christopher Alexander’s writings in the hope that a new understanding might grow into meaning that can enrich life rather than entertain it with ‘interesting’ visuals.
Only one of these projects has a plan and section – the Portuguese house. One could hardly speak of this report as being ‘minimal’ as it comes with an astonishing 36 photographs and two drawings. Still, while offering an extravaganza of ‘arty’ images, there is a sense of display seeking ‘likes’ rather than highlighting any internal identity or presence of meaning. Here, the camera becomes the self-conscious eye recording the 'visual performance.'
'Filipe Pina and David Bilo extend Portuguese farmhouse with gabled concrete forms'
There is a strange lack of engagement in these images that stand stark and bold before us as they declare their singular intention to impress, leaving one with the question: Just what is the experience of architecture? Where is it?
P.S.
And they keep turning up: yet another project appears – see: https://www.dezeen.com/2022/05/14/maine-home-whitten-architects-treehouse/. Here a glowing text and a limited number of selected images provide us with the information about this place. We are left learning about places with very little knowledge, allowing us space to invent our own interpretations of the world. We all know the problem with ‘a little knowledge,’ but we fail to recognise these publication strategies as ‘a dangerous thing.’ We are given five images to know about this project. Experience is richer and more diverse than this limited, piecemeal understanding. Yet, the Portuguese project has shown us that it is not merely a matter of number - there is something more, something integral and richer that is missing. Is the problem photography - the special eye? The concern is that we will come to see the world only as the camera does.
'Whitten Architects places single-storey Maine home on stilts to “evoke a treehouse” '
https://www.dezeen.com/2022/05/14/maine-home-whitten-architects-treehouse/
*
16 MAY 2022
We seem to forget that architects once rooted their action in theory, reaching out to other fields of knowledge in order to seek inspiration and guidance for concepts: architecture was not just a matter of aesthetics or tasteful details.
In Wordsworth, Faber, London, 1965 - original edition 1930 - Herbert Read derides the idea of art as being a matter of taste:
p.19
Art does not yield its highest felicity to those who treat it like sweetmeat, to be taken when the mind is too satiated for grosser nutriment. That is the miserably insufficient concept of art as the subject-matter of ‘taste.’
In The Open Hand Essays on Le Corbusier (edited Russell Walden, MIT Press, 1982), in his essay on Le Corbusier’s early years in Paris, Russell Walden records:
p. 127
Jeanneret . . . was forever looking over his shoulder to history to sustain himself and his personal vision in modern architecture.
p. 120
Jeanneret . . . became heir unconsciously to the diffuse Rousseauist tradition that was influential in encouraging a love of nature and a sympathy for egalitarian political theories.
Gertrude Stein, in Picasso, as quoted by Stephen Scheding in A Small Unsigned Painting A Vintage Book Random House Australia 1998, writes: (p.52)
Picasso to Gertrude Stein, as recorded by Stein in Picasso 1938: He was still a little troubled, no, he repeated, you have to know something to paint a picture, you have to, you have to.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.